@askalphaxiv: A fascinating paper supervised by Yoshua Bengio "Generative Recursive Reasoning" Test time compute should scale not jus…

X AI KOLs Timeline Papers

Summary

The paper 'Generative Recursive Reasoning' introduces a method that scales test-time compute by sampling multiple latent reasoning trajectories in parallel, enabling the model to explore diverse hypotheses and avoid deterministic collapse. This approach improves performance on tasks such as Sudoku, ARC AGI, N Queens, and graph coloring, and can also generate valid Sudoku boards and MNIST digits.

A fascinating paper supervised by Yoshua Bengio "Generative Recursive Reasoning" Test time compute should scale not just by thinking deeper, but by thinking wider. This paper makes recursion generative. It samples many latent reasoning trajectories, letting the model explore multiple hypotheses in parallel, so they don't follow one deterministic path and collapse to one answer. It improves Sudoku, ARC AGI, N Queens, and graph coloring, while also generating valid Sudoku boards and MNIST digits from scratch.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/21/26, 07:39 PM

A fascinating paper supervised by Yoshua Bengio

“Generative Recursive Reasoning”

Test time compute should scale not just by thinking deeper, but by thinking wider.

This paper makes recursion generative. It samples many latent reasoning trajectories, letting the model explore multiple hypotheses in parallel, so they don’t follow one deterministic path and collapse to one answer.

It improves Sudoku, ARC AGI, N Queens, and graph coloring, while also generating valid Sudoku boards and MNIST digits from scratch.

Similar Articles

Generative Recursive Reasoning

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces Generative Recursive reAsoning Models (GRAM), a probabilistic framework that extends recursive reasoning models by enabling stochastic latent trajectories, multiple hypotheses, and inference-time scaling through depth and parallel sampling.

Recursive Agentic Reasoning

arXiv cs.AI

The paper recasts test-time reasoning methods as recursion operators—Grow, Prune, and Branch—and evaluates them, finding that Branch consistently improves accuracy by recovering from budget-exhausted outputs, while recommending paired scoring for comparative studies.