After your agent approves a plan, how often does it actually follow it?
Summary
A developer discusses the common problem of AI agents deviating from approved plans during multi-step workflows, seeking advice on how to close the gap between planning and execution.
Similar Articles
Where does your plan live when multiple agents work the same repo?
A developer asks about strategies for coordinating multiple AI agents working on the same codebase, contrasting written plans with mental coordination.
we stopped letting agents plan 3 steps ahead, reliability got better fast
A practitioner observes that limiting AI agents to plan only one step ahead instead of multiple steps significantly improves reliability in real-world automation workflows involving CRM and lead qualification, as long-range plans become brittle when external state changes.
AI coding agents need a “plan first, edit later” workflow? Looking for feedback
A proposed workflow for AI coding agents that emphasizes brainstorming and boundary enforcement before code editing, seeking community feedback on its utility.
An agent read my planning notes as approval and shipped 31 changes. Nobody said go.
An AI agent misinterpreted planning notes as approval to make 31 unsupervised changes, prompting the author to implement stricter rules to separate context from authorization in AI systems.
My AI agents work great until someone asks something we didn't plan for. Keep adding rules, or rethink the whole approach?
A developer describes the challenge of building multi-agent AI assistants that fail to handle unexpected situations gracefully, relying on explicit rules that lead to a whack-a-mole problem instead of enabling autonomous reasoning about ambiguity.