SWE-rebench leaderboard update: GLM-5.2, Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B and more + improved UI
Summary
SWE-rebench leaderboard updated with new models (GLM-5.2, Qwen3.6, Gemma 4 31B, etc.) and an improved UI, showing performance rankings on software engineering tasks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/01/26, 04:17 PM
Similar Articles
I tested Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5-27B and Gemma 4 on the same real architecture-writing task on an RTX 5090
A hands-on benchmark of four local LLMs—Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.6-35B, Qwen3.5-27B and Gemma 4—on a 20k-token architecture-writing task shows Qwen3.6-27B delivering the best overall balance of clarity, completeness and usefulness on an RTX 5090.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B are officially on the public Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard!
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Qwen3.5-9B models are officially on the Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard, with little-coder achieving 24.6% on the 35B variant, surpassing Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3-Coder-480B, while the 9B model shows that sub-10B local models can compete on hard agentic benchmarks.
gemma-4-12b-it vs Qwen3.5-9B on shared benchmarks: Qwen is overall winner beating gemma in 5/8 benchmarks despite a smaller footprint
Qwen3.5-9B outperforms gemma-4-12b-it on 5 of 8 benchmarks despite having a smaller footprint, with gemma only slightly better at coding.
Gemma 4 31B's competence surprised me
A user shares anecdotal findings that Gemma 4 31B outperforms Qwen 3.6 models and matches Opus 4.7 in understanding and refactoring messy academic code, highlighting a benchmark (SciCode) where Gemma excels.
Qwen 3.7 Max scores 60.6% on SWE-Bench Pro
Qwen 3.7 Max achieves a score of 60.6% on SWE-Bench Pro, demonstrating competitive performance on software engineering tasks.