I don’t believe this benchmark 27b size model next opus 4.5! Anyone can confirm testing with real agentic workflow?
Summary
A 27B parameter model reportedly outperforms Opus 4.5 on a benchmark, prompting community skepticism and requests for real-world agentic workflow validation.
Similar Articles
Alpie Core 32B, 4 bit any real agent workflow tests or just vendor benchmarks?
The article questions the validity of vendor benchmarks for Alpie Core 32B, a 4-bit reasoning coding model optimized for low VRAM and agent workflows, noting a lack of independent benchmark replication.
@danshipper: This is wrong, it’s the same model But it does fall back to Opud 4.8 slightly more, so the benchmarks are measuring a m…
Dan Shipper argues that the Fable 5 model is not nerfed but falls back to Opus 4.8 more often, causing mixed benchmark results, contrary to claims of severe degradation.
A 4b model is now beating 30b ones at web research and the reason is not size
A 4 billion parameter open model from the Apodex family outperforms 30 billion parameter models on web research benchmarks, attributed to careful training data and self-verification techniques rather than raw scale, suggesting a more democratic trajectory for AI capability.
@bcherny: Seeing a number of benchmarks showing Opus is the best model for long-running work. Five tips for running Opus autonomo…
Practical tips for running Anthropic's Claude Opus autonomously for hours or days, such as using auto mode, dynamic workflows, and self-verification; also references the SWE-Marathon benchmark for long-horizon software tasks.
Is it agentic enough? Benchmarking open models on your own tooling
This blog post introduces a benchmark methodology for evaluating how well open models perform on agentic coding tasks, focusing not just on accuracy but on the efficiency of the agent's process. It provides a customizable tooling harness using the pi coding agent and tests across models and library revisions.