EditAgent: Rethinking Agentic Image Editing

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

EditAgent 提出一种新的智能体图像编辑框架,通过将编辑步骤路由到多样化的专用编辑器并利用验证记录进行列表式评判,同时扩展了智能体的动作空间与观察空间,显著提升了复杂图像编辑任务的可靠性与效率。

Agentic image editors decompose complex requests into steps, but when a step fails, they mostly retry with the same narrow set of tools and a judge that scores each output by eye directly. We argue that such agents are bounded by two spaces: the action space of what the agent can do, and the observation space of what its judge can see. On our expert-annotated benchmark, a general-purpose editor yields no usable result in over 40% of the cases, and no judge is reliable across edit types. We present EditAgent, which expands both spaces. It routes each step to general editors and specialized methods, and attaches to each candidate a verification record. With these records, off-the-shelf VLM judges outperform finetuned reward models. Candidates are generated in parallel and judged in one listwise call: experts prefer this to sequential refinement in 78.5% of decided comparisons, at no more than half the judge calls. EditAgent improves two open-weight editors on three benchmarks and serves as a data engine for training stronger editors.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/30/26, 07:09 AM

Paper page - EditAgent: Rethinking Agentic Image Editing

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.39664

Abstract

EditAgent broadens agentic image editing by routing steps to diverse editors and using verification records for listwise judging, improving reliability and efficiency.

Agentic image editorsdecompose complex requests into steps, but when a step fails, they mostly retry with the same narrow set of tools and a judge that scores each output by eye directly. We argue that such agents are bounded by two spaces: theaction spaceof what the agent can do, and theobservation spaceof what its judge can see. On our expert-annotated benchmark, a general-purpose editor yields no usable result in over 40% of the cases, and no judge is reliable across edit types. We present EditAgent, which expands both spaces. It routes each step to general editors and specialized methods, and attaches to each candidate a verification record. With these records, off-the-shelfVLM judgesoutperform finetunedreward models. Candidates are generated in parallel and judged in one listwise call: experts prefer this to sequential refinement in 78.5% of decided comparisons, at no more than half the judge calls. EditAgent improves twoopen-weight editorson three benchmarks and serves as a data engine for training stronger editors.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39664 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39664 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39664 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

ThinkDrag: Semantic Drag-Based Image Editing with Visual Reasoning

Hugging Face Daily Papers

ThinkDrag提出了一种统一的多模态框架,将视觉推理引入基于拖拽的图像编辑,通过语义变换和显式推理轨迹解释用户意图,并发布了DragBench++基准测试,实现了最先进的编辑效果。

Edit Discovery in Human-AI Interactions

arXiv cs.LG

论文提出 Edit Discovery Optimization (EDO) 问题框架,用于在有限编辑器成本预算下选择性地将人机交互数据交给更强的编辑器(人类专家或更强模型)检查与修正,并提出在线算法 EDIT 在四个推理与事实问答基准上取得更优的成本-错误权衡。

Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing

Hugging Face Daily Papers

该论文提出了 RISEBench 及其扩展版本 RISEBench++,这是首个评估推理驱动视觉编辑(Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing)的基准,涵盖时序、因果、空间、逻辑、反事实及混合推理等六个维度,并提出训练无关的 RISE-Agent 框架,结果显示即使是 GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst 也仅达 56.6% 准确率。

ManyAgents

Product Hunt

ManyAgents 是一款新发布的 Mac 应用,可在一个窗口中统一管理和运行多个 AI 编码智能体。