@lukas_m_ziegler: why i'd learn robotics over AI engineering for the next 12-24 months: everyone is an AI engineer now... that's the whol…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

The author argues that learning robotics is more advantageous than AI engineering in the next 12-24 months due to market saturation in AI, with robotics offering unique opportunities for building a competitive moat.

why i'd learn robotics over AI engineering for the next 12-24 months: everyone is an AI engineer now... that's the whole problem you can't build a moat out of what a subagent does at 3am for pennies robotics is the opposite: > the models already work, what's missing is x.com/DeRonin_/statu…
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/02/26, 03:53 AM

why i’d learn robotics over AI engineering for the next 12-24 months: everyone is an AI engineer now… that’s the whole problem you can’t build a moat out of what a subagent does at 3am for pennies robotics is the opposite: > the models already work, what’s missing is x.com/DeRonin_/statu…

Ronin (@DeRonin_): why i’d learn robotics over AI engineering for the next 12-24 months:

everyone is an AI engineer now… that’s the whole problem

you can’t build a moat out of what a subagent does at 3am for pennies

robotics is the opposite:

> the models already work, what’s missing is

Similar Articles

I don't think learning more AI tools is enough anymore.

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article argues that learning to use AI tools is not enough; the real advantage comes from building systems, gaining attention, communicating ideas, and creating products people want. Execution and combination of skills will matter more than just AI proficiency.