LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger
Summary
This paper introduces LedgerMind, a provenance-constrained multimodal agentic reasoning framework that uses a Structured Evidence Ledger to ensure grounded, faithful reasoning in visual question answering, addressing failure patterns like hallucination and over-reasoning.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/31/26, 05:52 AM
Paper page - LEDGERMIND: Provenance-Constrained Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with a Structured Evidence Ledger
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.28374
Abstract
Multimodalagentsforvisualquestionansweringincreasinglyoperateasmulti-steptrajectoriesthatinterleaveperception,retrieval,andreasoning,yetevaluationstilllargelyreducestofinal-answeraccuracy.Thisaggregatesignalcannottellwhetheracorrectanswerwasreachedthroughgroundedevidence,languagepriors,oraccidentalerrorcancellation.Weproposetotreatamultimodalagenttrajectoryasaprovenance-constrainedstatemachine:tooloutputsarenormalizedintoaStructuredEvidenceLedgerthatservesasthetrajectorystate,downstreamreasoninganddecisionclaimsmayciteonlyactiveledgerentries,groundingischeckedattheentityandnumericlevel,andrepairisrealizedastypedstatetransitionsthatcannotintroducecontentwithouttool-producedprovenance.WeinstantiatethisdesignasLedgerMind(Provenance-ConstrainedMultimodalAgenticReasoningwithaStructuredEvidenceLedger),augmentedbyaThree-LayerGroundingProtocol,anAdaptiveDual-PathDispatcherthatmatchesreasoningdepthtoquestioncomplexity,andanEvent-TriggeredVerification-and-Repairenginewithaformalprovenancenon-amplificationguarantee.WeuseLedgerMindtotargetfourrecurringfailurepatternsthatfinal-answeraccuracytendstoobscure:unsupportedintermediatereasoning,citation-backedentityhallucination(PhantomGrounding),over-reasoningonsimplequeries,andrepair-timeamplification.ExperimentsacrossmultiplemultimodalreasoningbenchmarksandbackboneMLLMsshowthatLedgerMindimprovesbothansweraccuracyandtrajectory-levelfaithfulness.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607\.28374
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.28374 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.28374 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.28374 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Beacon: Knowing When and How to Perform Agentic Visual Reasoning
This paper introduces Beacon, an agentic visual reasoning model that improves multimodal LLMs' ability to decide when to use tools and benefit from tool use, using Necessity-Aware Adaptive Reward and Hint-Guided Capability Expansion in reinforcement learning.
Retrieve, Integrate, and Synthesize: Spatial-Semantic Grounded Latent Visual Reasoning
This paper introduces RIS, a framework for spatial-semantic grounded latent visual reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models to overcome information bottlenecks. It proposes anchoring latent tokens to spatial and semantic evidence, showing improvements on benchmarks like V* and HRBench.
Multi-Perspective Evidence Synthesis and Reasoning for Unsupervised Multimodal Entity Linking
MSR-MEL introduces an unsupervised framework using LLMs to synthesize and reason over multi-perspective evidence for multimodal entity linking, outperforming prior methods on standard benchmarks.
RRM: Experience-Driven Reflective Retrieval Memory for Long-Horizon Multimodal Reasoning
This paper introduces Reflective Retrieval Memory (RRM), a memory framework that distills procedural retrieval experience from historical task trajectories to improve evidence retrieval for long-horizon multimodal reasoning. RRM matches or exceeds prior state-of-the-art on M3-Bench-Robot, M3-Bench-Web, and Video-MME-Long benchmarks.
Why LLMs Hallucinate on Structured Knowledge: A Mechanistic Analysis of Reasoning over Linearized Representations
This paper presents a mechanistic analysis of why LLMs hallucinate when reasoning over linearized structured knowledge, finding that hallucinations stem from systematic internal dynamics such as attention on shortcut cues and failures in semantic grounding in feed-forward layers, rather than random noise.