what would you actually train a browser-agent model to be good at?
Summary
The article discusses challenges in training browser-agent models for sequential decision-making, such as error recovery and memory, and seeks input on optimizing training objectives. The author mentions working on the 'mako' model at tinyfish and invites community feedback.
Similar Articles
@sydneyrunkle: learn about how to build agents that interact w/ the browser!
Learn how to build AI agents that can interact with the browser.
What actually breaks when your AI agent needs to browse the web at scale (lessons from 3 months of failures)
A practitioner shares hard-won lessons from building an AI research agent that browses the web at scale, highlighting how IP blocking, rate limits, and silent hallucination of missing data break agents mid-task. The author recommends treating web access as an unreliable tool with explicit fallback instructions, plus rotating residential proxies at the infrastructure layer to eliminate silent failures.
Built my first AI research agent in n8n—what would you improve next?
The user built an AI research agent workflow using n8n, Tavily, and OpenRouter to automate web searches and report generation, and is seeking advice for enhancements like multi-model fallback and source credibility scoring.
The "browser agents are expensive and still maturing" framing might be missing something architectural
Discusses architectural issues with current browser agents using headless Chrome + AI layer, and presents Opera Neon's CLI as an alternative where AI is integrated into the browser, reducing token overhead and improving understanding.
How would you separate model improvements from agent infrastructure in an evaluation?
The post discusses the October 12 Cheeky Pint episode featuring Zuckerberg and Wang, posing methodological questions about how to isolate model improvements from agent infrastructure in AI agent evaluations. It suggests controlled comparisons with fixed tool setups and each model's preferred setup, with task completion, permission violations, and recovery failures reported separately.