what would you actually train a browser-agent model to be good at?

Reddit r/AI_Agents News

Summary

The article discusses challenges in training browser-agent models for sequential decision-making, such as error recovery and memory, and seeks input on optimizing training objectives. The author mentions working on the 'mako' model at tinyfish and invites community feedback.

i’ve been thinking about browser agents less as “llms that can click things” and more as a pretty weird sequential decision-making problem. getting the first few actions right usually isn’t that impressive anymore. the harder stuff seems to be: - noticing that an action silently failed - recovering without repeating the same thing 8 times - remembering what matters from 20 steps ago - handling unexpected page states - knowing when to backtrack vs keep going - deciding when the task is actually complete so if you had a giant dataset of browser-agent trajectories, what behavior would you optimize for? raw task success seems obvious, but it feels like that misses a lot. two agents can both fail a task, but one realizes it’s stuck after 2 steps while another burns 50 actions first. we’ve been thinking about this while working on mako at tinyfish, a model specifically for web agents, and i’m curious what people here would actually want reflected in the training objective/evals. what’s the browser-agent behavior you’d most want a model to learn that current models consistently suck at?
Original Article

Similar Articles

What actually breaks when your AI agent needs to browse the web at scale (lessons from 3 months of failures)

Reddit r/AI_Agents

A practitioner shares hard-won lessons from building an AI research agent that browses the web at scale, highlighting how IP blocking, rate limits, and silent hallucination of missing data break agents mid-task. The author recommends treating web access as an unreliable tool with explicit fallback instructions, plus rotating residential proxies at the infrastructure layer to eliminate silent failures.

How would you separate model improvements from agent infrastructure in an evaluation?

Reddit r/artificial

The post discusses the October 12 Cheeky Pint episode featuring Zuckerberg and Wang, posing methodological questions about how to isolate model improvements from agent infrastructure in AI agent evaluations. It suggests controlled comparisons with fixed tool setups and each model's preferred setup, with task completion, permission violations, and recovery failures reported separately.