@rohanpaul_ai: Another example that the harness, more than the model itself, decides how far intelligence actually gets. With the API …
Summary
The tweet highlights how Atomic Agent, a model-agnostic agent layer, improves the performance of GLM 5.3 by executing model actions and preserving state, nearly doubling token usage for only a 77-cent cost increase.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/29/26, 08:08 PM
Another example that the harness, more than the model itself, decides how far intelligence actually gets.
With the API alone, execution ends when the model stops.
@atomicagent_io, a model-agnostic agent layer, made GLM 5.3 better and it costs only 77 cents more.
It kept the run alive, executed the model’s actions, feeds failures back, preserves state, and decides when the loop should stop.
In these 3 prompts, that roughly doubled token usage, but added only $0.77 to the total cost.
Outputs: ✦ GLM 5.3, API only: 543,290 tokens, $2.39 ✦ GLM 5.3 + Atomic Agent: 1,091,380 tokens, $3.16
There is a big difference between asking a model once and letting a model work. And a model-agnostic agent layer sits exactly on that boundary.
Atomic Agent (@atomicagent_io): Atomic Agent made GLM 5.3 better and it costs only 77 cents more!
We ran three prompts: ✦ Teddy bear falling apart mid-run ✦ Frog popping ✦ Snowman melting in a sauna
Outputs: ✦ GLM 5.3, API only: 543,290 tokens, $2.39 ✦ GLM 5.3 + Atomic Agent: 1,091,380 tokens, $3.16
An
Similar Articles
@sydneyrunkle: let's assume agent = model + harness unfortunately, good models are getting really expensive! so you need a great harne…
A guide on optimizing AI agent performance by improving the harness component to compensate for expensive model costs, focusing on hill climbing techniques.
@aiDotEngineer: Your Agent Can Now Train Models The argument from @mervenoyann: open source models have caught up. GLM 5.1 is leading t…
The talk by @mervenoyann demonstrates that open source models like GLM 5.1 have caught up to closed models, and shows how Hugging Face's ecosystem enables agents to train models, run inference, and build workflows.
@mardehaym: To truly understand AI agents, you need to understand the harness. And it's not the model. I went deep on how a working…
The article emphasizes that in AI agents, the harness—comprising tools, context, controls, and workflows—is more critical than the model for achieving reliable, safe, and traceable outcomes.
@omarsar0: Build and own your harness, folks. Very few people understand the magic behind customizing and optimizing an agent harn…
The tweet emphasizes building custom AI agent harnesses to optimize performance, citing Pi's adoption and discussing self-improving algorithms and local models for better control and efficiency.
@omarsar0: Build for agents, folks! Have said for a while now that models are already very "smart", but need better harnesses and …
Omar Santoso shares commentary on the release of Pine Computer, arguing that AI models are already capable but need better agent-oriented harnesses and environments, highlighting the significant cost implications of building for agents.