@MaximeRivest: At first glance: > Structural Equation Modeling (SEM/Path Analysis) > Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural OD…
Summary
The author compares Structural Equation Modeling, Neural ODEs, and AI Programs like DSPy as declarative frameworks for defining and optimizing computational graphs, arguing that structured flows are essential for trustworthy AI agents.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/03/26, 03:52 PM
At first glance:
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM/Path Analysis) Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs) AI Programs (like DSPy)
belong to completely different worlds.
However, they share a fundamental architecture that makes them each very powerful ways for us (humans) to flirt with unknowns / probabilistic / undetermined.
All three are declarative frameworks for defining and optimizing computational graphs.
- Separation of Structure and Optimization:
In all three, you (the human) define the structure of the problem or the flow of information. You set up the “skeleton.” Then, an underlying engine (an optimizer, a solver, or a teleprompter) figures out the specific weights, parameters, or prompts needed to make your skeleton match reality or achieve a goal.
- Modular Composition:
They all treat smaller operations as building blocks that can be chained together. An output from one node/module becomes the input to the next.
- Data-Driven Alignment:
None of these models are static. Whether it’s minimizing covariance differences in SEM, minimizing L2 loss against time-series data in Neural ODEs, or using an optimizer like GEPA to improve LLM accuracy in DSPy, they all update their internal states based on empirical data.
I firmly believe that as long as AI agents remains built on structure-less and purely data-driven systems LLMs (its mostly tokens in and tokens out), rather than being built on structured flows of information with a modular skeleton where some parts can be optimized using empirical data and others are explicitly designed (deterministic, hierarchical control flow), AI agents will be impossible to fully trust. This will prevent those coding Agents from reaching the many, many nines of reliability required for full automation. Full automation is completely different from automation that only kind of works.
if my coding agents was my employee, I would fire them. I don’t care that you are (sometimes) a brilliant coder.
If you cannot be trusted and you don’t learn from your mistake, you are a liability.
Similar Articles
@MaximeRivest: https://x.com/MaximeRivest/status/2055293570119065875
MaximeRivest explains DSPy's five core components—Optimizers, Signatures, LMs, Modules, and Adapters—and argues that effective AI engineering requires mastering these elements, highlighting the often-overlooked role of rendering structured outputs.
Automatic Ordinary Differential Equations Discovery For Biological Systems Using Large Language Model Powered Agentic System
This paper introduces MEDA, an LLM- and symbolic regression-powered agentic framework for automatically discovering ordinary differential equation (ODE) models of biological dynamical systems. It retrieves background knowledge, proposes candidate ODEs, and evaluates them across canonical model retrieval, extrapolation, and open-ended discovery tasks, demonstrating strong structural recovery and biologically plausible models.
From Hybrid Mechanistic--Data-Driven Modeling Toward Neuro-Symbolic AI: What, Why, and How
This paper introduces the Hybrid-to-NeSy (H2N) framework, which systematically translates hybrid mechanistic-data-driven models into neuro-symbolic AI designs, enabling the derivation of metrics for structural violation and belief dispersion as measures of epistemic uncertainty in the mechanistic part.
The move from agent loops to structured graphs, with the research behind it
A technical write-up discusses the shift from agent loops to structured graphs in production AI agent work, backed by references to durable execution engines (Temporal, Restate) and research like AFlow which uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to optimize workflow graphs.
An Agentic AI Scientific Community for Automated Neural Operator Discovery
This paper presents an agentic AI scientific community of virtual labs that autonomously discover neural operator architectures for PDE problems. Using LLM planners, numerical workers, and reviewers under a citation-based economy, the system produces high-accuracy hybrid architectures, with results suggesting no universal winner among operator families.