@0xSero: Everything you are saying here is 100% true. Here's the problem, if we have super intelligence which I believe we cross…
Summary
A Twitter user agrees with a previous sentiment that superintelligence has been achieved and warns that governments will seize the means of production and direct the highest quality memory for their own purposes.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/28/26, 10:07 PM
@RayFernando1337 Everything you are saying here is 100% true.
Here’s the problem, if we have super intelligence which I believe we crossed that threshold.
Governments will seize the means of production, cap what can go to the consumers, and direct the highest caliber memory to their own
Similar Articles
@elonmusk: As I was saying …
Elon Musk urges reading Bostrom's Superintelligence, warning that AI could be more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
@VraserX: One of the biggest AI misconceptions is that intelligence has to become superhuman before society changes. Cheap human-…
The tweet challenges a common AI misconception by suggesting that human-level AI competence at massive scale could already cause significant economic and societal changes.
@HealthRanger: Far too many people are worried about super HIGH intelligence destroying humanity, when we should be worried about supe…
This tweet critiques the common fear of super high intelligence, suggesting that super low intelligence poses a greater threat to humanity.
@CliffordSosin: https://x.com/CliffordSosin/status/2078594661359194500
An opinion piece arguing that superintelligence may be incremental rather than explosive, as the limits of AI lie not in reasoning but in the slow pace of real-world verification and complex emergent systems.
@VraserX: A perfectly aligned superintelligence could still create a horrible future if it is perfectly aligned to the wrong inst…
The post argues that a perfectly aligned superintelligence could still create a bad future if aligned to the wrong institutions, highlighting ownership as an immediate political problem.