traces every function call with ~40ns resolution, and
renders a timeline of call stacks going back (a configurable) ~10ms.
You use it like perf: point it to a process and off it goes. The key difference from perf is that instead of sampling call stacks throughout time, magic-trace uses Intel Processor Trace to snapshot a ring buffer of all control flow leading up to a chosen point in time1. Then, you can explore an interactive timeline of what happened.
You can point magic-trace at a function such that when your application calls it, magic-trace takes a snapshot. Alternatively, attach it to a running process and detach it with Ctrl+C, to see a trace of an arbitrary point in your program.
1
perf can do this too, but that’s not how most people use it. In fact, if you peek under the hood you’ll see that magic-trace uses perf to drive Intel PT.
Testimonials
“Magic-trace is one of the simplest command-line debugging tools I have ever used.”
Francis Ricci, Jane Street
“Magic-trace is not just for performance. The tool gives insight directly into what happens in your program, when, and why. Consider using it for all your introspective goals!”
Andrew Hunter, Jane Street
I use perf a ton, and I think that both perf and magic-trace give perspectives that the other doesn’t. The benefit I got from magic-trace was entirely based on the fact that it works in slices at any zoom level, so I was able to see all the function calls that a 70ns function was performing, which was invisible in perf.
Make sure the system you want to trace is supported. The constraints that most commonly trip people up are: VMs are mostly not supported, Intel only (Skylake2 or later), Linux only.
Here’s a sample C program to try out. It’s a slightly modified version of the example in man 3 dlopen. Download that, build it with gcc demo.c -ldl -o demo, then leave it running ./demo. We’re going to use that program to learn how dlopen works.
Run magic-trace attach -pid $(pidof demo). When you see the message that it’s successfully attached, wait a couple seconds and Ctrl+Cmagic-trace. It will output a file called trace.fxt.gz in your working directory.
Open magic-trace.org, click “Open trace file” in the top-left-hand and give it the trace file generated in the previous step.
That should have expanded into a trace. Zoom in until you can see an individual loop through dlopen/dlsym/cos/printf/dlclose.
W zooms into wherever your mouse cursor is pointed (you’ll need to zoom in a bunch to see anything useful),
S zooms out,
A moves left,
D moves right, and
scroll wheel moves your viewport up and down the stack. You’ll only need to scroll to see particularly deep stack traces, it’s probably not useful for this example.
Click and drag on the white space around the call stacks to measure. Plant flags by clicking in the timeline along the top. Using the measurement tool, measure how long it takes to run cos. On my screen it takes ~5.7us.
Congratulations, you just magically traced your first program!
In contrast to traditional perf workflows, magic-trace excels at hypothesis generation. For example, you might notice that taking 6us to run cos is a really long time! If you zoom in even more, you’ll see that there’s actually five pink “[untraced]” cells in there. If you re-run magic-trace with root and pass it -trace-include-kernel, you’ll see stacktraces for those. They’re page fault handlers! The demo program actually calls cos twice. If you zoom in even more near the end of the 6us cos call, you’ll see that the second call takes far less time and does not page fault.
How to use it
magic-trace continuously records control flow into a ring buffer. Upon some sort of trigger, it takes a snapshot of that buffer and reconstructs call stacks.
There are two ways to take a snapshot:
We just did this one: Ctrl+C magic-trace. If magic-trace terminates without already having taken a snapshot, it takes a snapshot of the end of the program.
You can also trigger snapshots when the application calls a function. To do so, pass magic-trace
the -trigger flag.
-trigger '?' brings up a fuzzy-finding selector that lets you choose from all
symbols in your executable,
-trigger SYMBOL selects a specific, fully mangled, symbol you know ahead of time, and
-trigger . selects the default symbol magic_trace_stop_indicator.
Stop indicators are powerful. Here are some ideas for where you might want to place one:
If you’re using an asynchronous runtime, any time a scheduler cycle takes too long.
In a server, when a request takes a surprisingly long time.
After the garbage collector runs, to see what it’s doing and what it interrupted.
After a compiler pass has completed.
You may leave the stop indicator in production code. It doesn’t need to do anything in particular, magic-trace just needs the name. It is just an empty, but not inlined, function. It will cost ~10us to call, but only when magic-trace actually uses it to take a snapshot.
Tristan Hume is the original author of magic-trace. He wrote it while working at Jane Street, who currently maintains it.
Intel PT is the foundational technology upon which magic-trace rests. We’d like to thank the people at Intel for their years-long efforts to make it available, despite its slow uptake in the greater software community.
magic-trace would not be possible without perfs extensive support for Intel PT. perf does most of the work in interpreting Intel PT’s output, and magic-trace likely wouldn’t exist were it not for their efforts. Thank you, perf developers.
magic-trace.org is a fork of Perfetto, with minor modifications. We’d like to thank the people at Google responsible for it. It’s a high quality codebase that solves a hard problem well.
The ideas behind magic-trace are in no way unique. We’ve written down a list of prior art that has influenced its design.
A curated list of open-source quantitative trading projects on GitHub, including AI-powered platforms like Qlib and FinGPT, multi-agent frameworks, and backtesting tools, all with tutorials and ready-to-use strategies.
A user curated a free GitHub repository aggregating numerous open-source quantitative finance tools, including pricing engines, backtesting frameworks, order book simulators, and risk models, making institutional-grade research tools accessible to individuals at minimal cost.
