What does voice AI actually cost you when it underperforms in production
Summary
A practitioner recounts experiences with voice AI in call centers, detailing hidden costs when solutions underperform in production, and asks for honest feedback from others with similar real-world experience.
Similar Articles
What I learned while calculating the real cost of a Voice AI call
An analysis of the real costs associated with Voice AI calls, covering factors like API usage, latency, and provider pricing.
AI voice agents look impressive in demos. Has anyone actually deployed one in production? What broke?
The article questions whether AI voice agents have been successfully deployed in production beyond impressive demos, highlighting the gap between demo performance and real-world reliability.
Voice feels like the underrated output layer for AI agents
The article discusses the underutilized potential of voice as an output layer for AI agents, highlighting practical use cases and workflow challenges beyond simple text-to-speech.
Five observability gaps we keep seeing in production voice AI stacks
Discusses five common observability gaps in production voice AI stacks, including blending infrastructure and conversation failures, lack of VAD visibility, inadequate sampling, noisy auto-generated evals, and evaluating at the wrong level.
6 months running a production voice agent for service businesses. The latency math is way harder than the demos suggest.
After 6 months running a voice AI agent for service businesses, the author reveals that real-world latency is bimodal (median ~800ms, p95 ~2.4s) and this p95 determines user perception. Issues like VAD misfires, function call degradation with long prompts, and TTS quality matter more than LLM choice, with multilingual support adding significant costs.