Optimizing Lithium Production Decisions under Geological, Demand, and Pricing Uncertainties: A POMDP Framework for Multi-Objective Decision Making

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper proposes a POMDP framework for multi-objective decision making in lithium production, addressing geological, demand, and pricing uncertainties to optimize mine opening and extraction method selection. The approach outperforms human-inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to shifting price regimes through belief state planning.

arXiv:2606.18598v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision making in lithium production is challenging, whether from an investor's perspective or a strategic production standpoint. Determining which mines to open and when to open them involves not only geological and price uncertainties, but also complexities around the choice of extraction method, from direct lithium extraction to hard rock mining. Prior work explored models of this problem and different methods to optimize mining decisions; these models did not account for uncertainty in pricing, uncertainty in demand, or different mining technologies to extract lithium. Incorporating different pricing models and extraction technology into these models enables more robust strategies for determining not only when and where to open a mine, but also which method of production to pursue. We frame the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and solve using belief state planning methods to get optimal decision making. In our study, we show that POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to shifting lithium price regimes (static, linear, exponential, and stochastic) through belief state planning and explicit uncertainty management. By optimally sequencing exploration, production, and technology choice, the framework achieves higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes over the projects lifetime in all different pricing and deposit scenarios.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/18/26, 05:40 AM

# Optimizing Lithium Production Decisions under Geological, Demand, and Pricing Uncertainties: A POMDP Framework for Multi-Objective Decision Making
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18598](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18598)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.18598)

> Abstract:Decision making in lithium production is challenging, whether from an investor's perspective or a strategic production standpoint\. Determining which mines to open and when to open them involves not only geological and price uncertainties, but also complexities around the choice of extraction method, from direct lithium extraction to hard rock mining\. Prior work explored models of this problem and different methods to optimize mining decisions; these models did not account for uncertainty in pricing, uncertainty in demand, or different mining technologies to extract lithium\. Incorporating different pricing models and extraction technology into these models enables more robust strategies for determining not only when and where to open a mine, but also which method of production to pursue\. We frame the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process \(POMDP\) and solve using belief state planning methods to get optimal decision making\. In our study, we show that POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to shifting lithium price regimes \(static, linear, exponential, and stochastic\) through belief state planning and explicit uncertainty management\. By optimally sequencing exploration, production, and technology choice, the framework achieves higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes over the projects lifetime in all different pricing and deposit scenarios\.

## Submission history

From: Anna Edmonds \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/72231850/2606.18598)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 17 Jun 2026 01:49:09 UTC \(926 KB\)

Similar Articles

Utility-Constrained Policy Optimization

arXiv cs.LG

This paper introduces a simple yet powerful methodology for Utility-Constrained MDPs (UCMDPs) that enables risk-sensitive constraints without fixing constraint limits in advance, outperforming baselines on Safety Gymnasium benchmarks.