@leerob: You might believe you should spend less time thinking about code because of AI. I strongly disagree! We’re watching thi…
Summary
The article argues that despite AI advancements, engineers must still understand code and systems, as AI-generated code can become a liability, and emphasizes the importance of CS fundamentals and system design.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/25/26, 06:33 AM
You might believe you should spend less time thinking about code because of AI.
I strongly disagree! We’re watching this play out live where tons of AI generated code becomes a liability.
At the end of the day, an engineer needs to be responsible / on call for code that gets shipped to production. If you don’t understand the system you’re trying to debug, you’re probably going to have a bad time.
Yes, AI can help with all of this, if you set up the proper systems. You can have agents triage prod logs, look at errors, etc. You can speed up parts of the investigation, but an engineer needs to make the call. There might be serious customer or financial implications from that change.
I expect the trend continue for trimming dependencies, vendoring code so you can modify it directly, preferring simpler systems with fewer abstractions, and spending waaaay more time thinking about system design and code maintenance.
I’ve said this before, but it’s a great time to get familiar with CS fundamentals and some of the history behind what great software looks like. Many parts will be different in the coming years as AI progresses, but also a lot more than people realize will stay the same.
Similar Articles
@rohit4verse: AI didn't make code cheap. it made bad code lethal. Matt Pocock: "Software fundamentals matter more than ever" AI in a …
Discusses how AI amplifies code quality, emphasizing that software fundamentals matter more than ever, and recommends five design patterns for building reliable AI agents.
AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less
The article argues that despite AI's growing ability to generate code, engineering discipline—especially code review and reliability practices—becomes more critical, not less.
Control the Ideas, Not the Code
In this blog post, antirez argues that in the age of AI, programmers should focus on controlling the ideas behind their software rather than reading every line of code, as AI can generate locally optimal code but humans excel at big-picture design and direction.
@garrytan: It's not that AI lets you write code faster. Plenty of people have noticed that. It's that AI lets you verify at a leve…
The post argues that the primary value of AI in programming is not just writing code faster, but enabling sustainable high-level verification and testing that was previously too costly in terms of human effort.
@addyosmani: https://x.com/addyosmani/status/2056078124346228860
A cautionary note from Addy Osmani that relying too heavily on AI to write code can hinder learning and degrade one's mental model of software development.