@leerob: You might believe you should spend less time thinking about code because of AI. I strongly disagree! We’re watching thi…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

The article argues that despite AI advancements, engineers must still understand code and systems, as AI-generated code can become a liability, and emphasizes the importance of CS fundamentals and system design.

You might believe you should spend less time thinking about code because of AI. I strongly disagree! We’re watching this play out live where tons of AI generated code becomes a liability. At the end of the day, an engineer needs to be responsible / on call for code that gets shipped to production. If you don’t understand the system you’re trying to debug, you’re probably going to have a bad time. Yes, AI can help with all of this, if you set up the proper systems. You can have agents triage prod logs, look at errors, etc. You can speed up parts of the investigation, but an engineer needs to make the call. There might be serious customer or financial implications from that change. I expect the trend continue for trimming dependencies, vendoring code so you can modify it directly, preferring simpler systems with fewer abstractions, and spending waaaay more time thinking about system design and code maintenance. I’ve said this before, but it’s a great time to get familiar with CS fundamentals and some of the history behind what great software looks like. Many parts will be different in the coming years as AI progresses, but also a lot more than people realize will stay the same.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/25/26, 06:33 AM

You might believe you should spend less time thinking about code because of AI.

I strongly disagree! We’re watching this play out live where tons of AI generated code becomes a liability.

At the end of the day, an engineer needs to be responsible / on call for code that gets shipped to production. If you don’t understand the system you’re trying to debug, you’re probably going to have a bad time.

Yes, AI can help with all of this, if you set up the proper systems. You can have agents triage prod logs, look at errors, etc. You can speed up parts of the investigation, but an engineer needs to make the call. There might be serious customer or financial implications from that change.

I expect the trend continue for trimming dependencies, vendoring code so you can modify it directly, preferring simpler systems with fewer abstractions, and spending waaaay more time thinking about system design and code maintenance.

I’ve said this before, but it’s a great time to get familiar with CS fundamentals and some of the history behind what great software looks like. Many parts will be different in the coming years as AI progresses, but also a lot more than people realize will stay the same.

Similar Articles

AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less

Hacker News Top

The article argues that despite AI's growing ability to generate code, engineering discipline—especially code review and reliability practices—becomes more critical, not less.

Control the Ideas, Not the Code

Hacker News Top

In this blog post, antirez argues that in the age of AI, programmers should focus on controlling the ideas behind their software rather than reading every line of code, as AI can generate locally optimal code but humans excel at big-picture design and direction.