Knowing When Thinking Is Not Enough: Teaching Small Reasoning Models to Reason Beyond Their Parametric Knowledge
Summary
This paper introduces FlyBy, a selective querying framework that trains small reasoning models to diagnose knowledge bottlenecks and query stronger models, improving reasoning performance on hard problems with lower serving cost.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/29/26, 08:17 AM
Paper page - Knowing When Thinking Is Not Enough: Teaching Small Reasoning Models to Reason Beyond Their Parametric Knowledge
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.34327
Abstract
Scalingtest-timecomputationisapowerfulwaytoimprovelanguage-modelreasoning,andisparticularlyappealingforsmallreasoningmodels(sRMs)thatarecheaptoserve.However,isadditionalthinkingalwaystherightoperation?Byinterveningatintermediatereasoningstatesacrosstwomodelfamiliesandmultiplescales,wefindthatself-refinementlargelyconsolidatesprobabilitymassontosolutionsalreadyreachablefromthecurrentstate,ratherthanmakingnewonesreachable.Theseinterventionsrevealtwofailureregimes:executionbottlenecks,wherethecorrectpathisreachableandreflectioncanrecoverit,andknowledgebottlenecks,whererelevantexternalinformationmakesitreachable.Motivatedbythisdistinction,weintroduceFlyBy,aselectivequeryingframework,andtrain4Band8Bvariantstoreasonfirst,diagnosewhatremainsunresolved,and,ataknowledgebottleneck,querystrongermodelswhoseparametricknowledgeextendsbeyonditsown.Supervisedfine-tuningbootstrapsamulti-depthqueryaction,andcost-awarereinforcementlearningcalibrateswhethertoquery,whattoask,andhowmuchtospend.On1,158hardproblemsacrosssixbenchmarks,FlyBy-4Bachieves45.96%pass@8,surpassingQwen3-14B(41.64%)at2.7timeslowerservingcost,whilealsoexceedingQwen3-8Binpass@1(16.85%vs.15.31%)[email protected]%.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub0Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609\.34327
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.34327 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.34327 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.34327 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Enhanced and Efficient Reasoning in Large Learning Models
This paper proposes a method for improving reasoning in large language models by recoding data to explicitly represent relationships, enabling efficient principled reasoning with polynomial-time learnability for relational rules, which addresses hallucinations and supports sound reasoning across multiple calls.
Are "small reasoning models" the next big shift? What should we actually be measuring?
A discussion of whether small reasoning models (SRMs) are the next major shift, sparked by Pathway's BDH architecture and its ARC-AGI-1 result, along with a framework for evaluating compactness, few-shot adaptation, training efficiency, and continual learning beyond marketing claims.
Reasoning Can Be Restored by Correcting a Few Decision Tokens
This paper shows that the reasoning gap between base LLMs and large reasoning models is concentrated on a small set of early planning tokens. It introduces disagreement-guided token intervention, where replacing only those critical tokens with a reasoning model's outputs allows a base model to nearly match the reasoning model's performance.
@rohanpaul_ai: A Primer paper about how reasoning models improve after training Shows that better reasoning models depend less on raw …
This primer paper explores how reasoning models improve after training, arguing that effective reasoning data relies more on checkable training evidence than raw data size. It categorizes reasoning data by verification methods and emphasizes preserving messy agent data for learning signals.
Stop When Further Reasoning Won't Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning Models
This paper proposes ASAG, a training-free method that adaptively stops reasoning in large reasoning models based on attention distributions, reducing token usage by ~40% while improving accuracy by 3.2% on benchmarks using DeepSeek-R1-Distill and Qwen3 models.