Petition to Withdraw Canada's Bill C-22
Summary
A petition has been launched urging the Canadian House of Commons to withdraw Bill C-22, which mandates bulk metadata retention and could weaken encryption, citing privacy and security concerns.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/11/26, 04:36 PM
Similar Articles
Canada’s Bill C-22 and the security cost of collecting more data
Canada's proposed Bill C-22 (Lawful Access Act, 2026) would require electronic service providers to retain metadata and build surveillance capabilities, raising privacy and security concerns for companies and users.
Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare
Canada's Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, is criticized by the EFF and tech companies as a repackaged surveillance bill that mandates metadata retention and forces encryption backdoors. Apple, Meta, and US congressional committees oppose the bill, citing significant risks to digital privacy and security.
@AaronGunn: Increasingly concerned about yet another Liberal bill called C-22. This proposed legislation has the potential to massi…
A tweet raises concerns about Canadian bill C-22, which would expand surveillance powers, mandate data retention and backdoors for tech companies, and lower legal thresholds for accessing personal information across the entire population, potentially forcing some tech firms to leave Canada.
Dontsurveil.me
Canada's Bill C-22 would require messaging apps like Signal and WhatsApp to build a backdoor for government access, undermining end-to-end encryption and threatening the privacy of all users.
@lucyhargreaves4: for anyone who hasn't been paying attention... C-22 is a terrible idea C-22's architecture is most similar to laws in p…
A tweet warns that Canada's C-22 lawful-access bill is a bad idea, comparing it to restrictive laws in China and Russia, while a cited article notes Google's warning that the bill could create major cybersecurity risks.