GraphDecisionBench: Benchmarking System One Models on Graph Tasks

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

GraphDecisionBench:一个模型无关的基准,用于评估 System One 模型在图结构任务上的决策能力,涵盖 14 种模型-接口配置,揭示了邻接识别准确并不等同于结构正确性等关键发现。

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for graph understanding and decision-making, while System One models such as Jev select directly from supplied options. However, the capabilities of System One models on graph-related tasks remain unclear. We introduce GraphDecide, a model-independent benchmark that combines structural task profiles, matched graph-text input contrasts and heuristic-proposal controls to diagnose graph decision performance. We evaluate Jev and related choice-based models alongside language-model baselines, covering fourteen model-interface configurations. Jev's results illustrate the benchmark's central distinctions: accurate adjacency recognition does not guarantee broader structural correctness, joint graph-text input does not consistently improve prediction, and feasible construction does not establish high solution quality. Its task contracts, candidate interfaces and scoring rules support comparison across native selectors and language-model adapters. Code and aggregate results are available at https://github.com/VictorYXL/JevGraphBench.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/12/26, 02:37 AM

Paper page - GraphDecisionBench: Benchmarking System One Models on Graph Tasks

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.06354

Abstract

Largelanguagemodels(LLMs)areincreasinglyexploredforgraphunderstandinganddecision-making,whileSystemOnemodelssuchasJevselectdirectlyfromsuppliedoptions.However,thecapabilitiesofSystemOnemodelsongraph-relatedtasksremainunclear.WeintroduceGraphDecide,amodel-independentbenchmarkthatcombinesstructuraltaskprofiles,matchedgraph-textinputcontrastsandheuristic-proposalcontrolstodiagnosegraphdecisionperformance.WeevaluateJevandrelatedchoice-basedmodelsalongsidelanguage-modelbaselines,coveringfourteenmodel-interfaceconfigurations.Jev’sresultsillustratethebenchmark’scentraldistinctions:accurateadjacencyrecognitiondoesnotguaranteebroaderstructuralcorrectness,jointgraph-textinputdoesnotconsistentlyimproveprediction,andfeasibleconstructiondoesnotestablishhighsolutionquality.Itstaskcontracts,candidateinterfacesandscoringrulessupportcomparisonacrossnativeselectorsandlanguage-modeladapters.Codeandaggregateresultsareavailableathttps://github.com/VictorYXL/JevGraphBench.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHubAdd to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.06354 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.06354 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.06354 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Microsoft-Decision-1, our model for fast decision-making

Hacker News Top

微软发布 Microsoft-Decision-1,一个专为快速决策打分设计的模型,可用于路由、分类、优先级排序与工作流控制,基于 Qwen3.5-9B 后训练,在 36 项基准测试中取得最高准确率,延迟比 GPT-6 Sol 快约 35 倍。

@yibie: https://x.com/yibie/status/2104076142500069608

X AI KOLs Timeline

This article demonstrates how to convert GLM-5.3-Flash into a Jev-style System 1 decision model, achieving typed decisions through a single forward pass. Benchmark tests show that it performs comparably to specialized models in terms of accuracy and speed.