@cHHillee: One hope for Tinker is that it can handle all the ML infra for posttraining for (approximately) everyone. So, curious, …
Summary
A user questions the barriers to using Tinker for all ML posttraining needs, inquiring about factors like speed, cost, scalability, correctness, and flexibility.
Similar Articles
@loganthorneloe: Read this to get started learning ML infra. This is an excellent high-level overview of important considerations in ML …
CMU Software Engineering Institute publishes an overview of ML training infrastructure, covering hardware considerations like GPU vs CPU and memory requirements.
@cHHillee: In modern ML accelerators, FLOPS have absolutely exploded. Often though, the bottleneck is not FLOPS but memory bandwid…
Thinky identifies human-to-AI bandwidth as a growing bottleneck akin to memory bandwidth issues in ML accelerators, proposing solutions to address this limitation.
@AnandButani: ml-intern by @huggingface is wild You drop a high-level prompt (“build the best scientific reasoning model” or “crush h…
Hugging Face’s open-source "ml-intern" agent automates the full post-training pipeline—from literature review and data cleaning to model tuning—given only a high-level prompt.
@tunguz: Here is one big reason why this matters. Time spent on non-LLM inference tasks is only going to increase. However, tool…
A post highlights that 42% of time in modern agentic coding is spent on CPU-based tool use, which is inefficient and presents a major opportunity to redesign these tools for AI agents.
Where are the recent improvements in AI coming from mostly?
A discussion on the sources of recent AI advancements, noting that post-training, fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning have become key, and asking about future directions beyond scaling.