STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning

arXiv cs.LG Papers

Summary

STRIDE introduces a training framework that uses learnable stepwise language feedback instead of scalar rewards to improve LLM reasoning, achieving state-of-the-art results on diverse benchmarks.

arXiv:2605.18851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL) have underscored its potential for incentivizing reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing step-level efforts suffer from costly annotations that limit domain coverage, while scalar scores further impose an information bottleneck, offering insufficient semantic bandwidth to improve intermediate decisions. Alternative language-critique approaches, which rely on frozen or external critics, provide richer textual feedback but lack the scalability needed for sustained policy improvement. In this work, we propose language-driven stepwise trajectory redirection, termed as STRIDE, a novel training framework that shifts process supervision from scalar rewards to learnable stepwise language feedback. Specifically, we co-train a generator and a generative verifier using only outcome-based rewards, eliminating external annotations, while delivering sustained policy improvement through jointly aligned verifier training. The verifier's stepwise language critiques explicitly localize and explain failures, enabling the generator to redirect reasoning trajectories at intermediate steps toward alternative decisions. The trajectory redirection design guarantees harmless policy improvement, even under noisy or suboptimal verifier feedback. Experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks show that STRIDE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, as well as achieving breakthroughs on zero-pass-rate problems where scalar methods yield no learning signal in our ablation studies, demonstrating the effectiveness of learnable stepwise language feedback for enhancing LLM reasoning.
Original Article

Similar Articles

STRIDE-ED: A Strategy-Grounded Stepwise Reasoning Framework for Empathetic Dialogue Systems

arXiv cs.CL

STRIDE-ED is a strategy-grounded reasoning framework for empathetic dialogue systems that uses structured multi-stage reasoning combined with a data refinement pipeline and two-stage training (supervised fine-tuning + multi-objective RL) to improve emotional understanding and response generation. The framework demonstrates consistent improvements across open-source LLMs on both automatic metrics and human evaluations.

Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces SFS-DPO, a reinforcement learning two-stage framework for step-level self-verification and self-correction in LLMs, with a teacher-assisted variant SFS-DPO-R. It demonstrates improvements in self-correction effectiveness across multiple LLMs with less training data than prior approaches.

STRIVE: Probing Reasoning Limits in Graded Plausibility Generation and Evaluation

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces STRIVE, an LLM-based framework for jointly generating and evaluating controlled event sets for psycholinguistic plausibility judgments. Experiments show that adding a global reasoning scratchpad and evaluator-guided refinement substantially improves generation quality, though near-boundary events remain challenging.

Learning to Refine Hidden States for Reliable LLM Reasoning

arXiv cs.LG

Proposes ReLAR, a reinforcement-guided latent refinement framework that iteratively updates hidden representations in LLMs before decoding, improving reasoning reliability and efficiency compared to chain-of-thought methods.