“AI Skills” are worthless in 2026

Lobsters Hottest News

Summary

Charles Miller argues that short-lived "AI skills" like prompt engineering have little long-term value, since such tricks are quickly absorbed into products and become obsolete, comparing them to outdated programming folklore like preferring ++i over i++.

<p><a href="https://lobste.rs/s/x1s5oq/ai_skills_are_worthless_2026">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/27/26, 01:59 AM

# “AI Skills” are worthless in 2026 Source: [https://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2026/10/26/ai-skills](https://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2026/10/26/ai-skills) By Charles Miller on26 October 2026 When I was first learning the C programming language, in my early 20s, it was[common knowledge](https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/27125/has-there-ever-been-a-c-compiler-where-using-i-was-faster-than-i)that of the two ways to increment a variable,`i\+\+`was slower than`\+\+i`\. The post\-increment function returned the original value of`i`, which meant stashing a copy of that value before performing the increment\. Pre\-increment avoided this wasteful operation\. And by “common knowledge” I really mean folklore, because I turned 20 in 1995 and even by then, the most basic of optimising compilers knew to check if you ever used the return value of`i\+\+`, and if not, skip the operation to save it\. Scratch an old programmer and you'll probably find a dozen or so ingrained habits that, in an era where CPUs are doing[branch prediction](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11227809/why-is-conditional-processing-of-a-sorted-array-faster-than-of-an-unsorted-array)and code reordering, are just as likely to make their program slower\. Anyway, remember prompt engineering? It makes sense to believe that all the tricks we come up with with to make models behave better, the ways of working with models that get us to a useful result faster, if they work, are going to be folded back into the product, packaged, and become the default experience a few months later\. And yet, in five years, I’m sure there will be old heads doggedly adding “you are an experienced software developer, make no mistakes” to their custom instructions\. I'm not saying it's worthless to keep up with the state of the art\. You still need to be able do your job today, to the best of your ability\. But a skill that can be picked up in a few weeks, and will be obsolete in a few months, has no value outside the moment\. Eighteen months ago, I was sitting in a crowded room watching a CEO enthusiastically declare that it was time to get on the AI train, because if you didn't get on it*right now*you'd be left behind\. Maybe I'm getting old, but in a world where Google, Facebook, the iPod, iPhone and iPad, and so many other examples have shown that getting it right is more valuable than getting in first, I feel content to just keep pace with the pack, ready to pull[Steven Bradbury](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUi4-H6hfw8)if and when the time comes\. - ai - nerd ← Previous ## [The Hibernate Origin Story \(Outsider Edition\)](https://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2026/10/23/hibernate-origin-story) 23 October 2026 I had nothing to do with the development of Hibernate, except that I happened to be in the room at the time holding a beer\. But it is still a fun story\.

Similar Articles

Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career

Hacker News Top

The author argues that relying on AI for coding may lead to long-term skill atrophy, potentially transforming software engineering from a lifelong career into a shorter-lived profession similar to professional athletics.

@ai_super_niko: https://x.com/ai_super_niko/status/2070299861757616606

X AI KOLs Timeline

This article discusses whether computer professionals still need to learn technical skills in an era where AI can write code. The author argues that surface-level technologies like syntax and APIs are depreciating, but deeper capabilities such as algorithms, design architecture, and judgment become more important. The focus of learning should shift from beginner-level skills to the knowledge required of senior engineers.

I don't think learning more AI tools is enough anymore.

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article argues that learning to use AI tools is not enough; the real advantage comes from building systems, gaining attention, communicating ideas, and creating products people want. Execution and combination of skills will matter more than just AI proficiency.