EngiAI: A Multi-Agent Framework and Benchmark Suite for LLM-Driven Engineering Design

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

EngiAI introduces a multi-agent framework and benchmark suite for LLM-driven engineering design, evaluating workflow, RAG, and HPC dimensions. Proprietary models achieve 96-97% task completion on Beams2D, while conditional branching remains challenging with 20-53% for Photonics2D.

arXiv:2605.19743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly applied to engineering design tasks, yet existing evaluation frameworks do not adequately address multi-agent systems that combine simulation, retrieval, and manufacturing preparation. We introduce a benchmark suite with three evaluation dimensions: (1) a workflow benchmark with seven prompt styles targeting distinct cognitive demands-including direct tool use, semantic disambiguation, conditional branching, and working-memory tasks; (2) a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) benchmark with gated scoring isolating retrieval contributions to parameter selection; and (3) an High Performance Computing (HPC) benchmark evaluating end-to-end ML training orchestration on a SLURM cluster. Alongside the benchmark we present EngiAI, a Multi-Agent System (MAS) reference implementation built on LangGraph that operationalizes the benchmark by coordinating seven specialized agents through a supervisor architecture, unifying topology optimization, document retrieval, HPC job orchestration, and 3D printer control. Across four LLM backends and two EngiBench problems, proprietary models achieve 96-97% average task completion on Beams2D, while open-source 4B-parameter models reach 55-78%, with clear generational improvement. Conditional branching proves most challenging, with task completion dropping to 20-53% for the conditional style on Photonics2D. RAG gating confirms near-perfect retrieval-augmented scores ($\approx 1.0$) versus near-zero without retrieval, validating the evaluation design. On HPC orchestration, one model completes all pipeline steps in 100% of runs while another drops to 50%, revealing that multi-step instruction following degrades over long-running workflows.
Original Article

Similar Articles

BEAMS: Benchmarking and Evaluating AI for Modeling and Simulation

arXiv cs.AI

The BEAMS Initiative presents a benchmark suite for evaluating AI tools in modeling and simulation, focusing on human-centered and responsible AI practices. Tests reveal variability across LLM-based engines, with better performance in qualitative tasks than causal reasoning.

InferenceBench: A Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Inference Optimization by AI Agents

arXiv cs.AI

InferenceBench is a benchmark that evaluates AI agents on optimizing LLM inference speed using an H100 GPU across multiple bottleneck scenarios. Results show agents improve over naive baselines but frequently converge on single frameworks and underperform simple hyperparameter searches, indicating a need for better exploration strategies.