Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

ASPIRE introduces a benchmark for self-evolving LLM agents from vague natural-language goals, revealing challenges in goal interpretation and stable weight-level improvement.

Many important forms of human learning begin with a vague goal, such as "become a better physicist" or "improve at research." Learners must interpret the goal, identify capability gaps, decide how to learn, and determine whether they have actually improved. In contrast, existing work on LLM self-evolution typically begins with tasks and evaluation metrics specified by humans, reducing self-evolution to optimizing an explicit objective rather than deciding what and how to learn. We introduce ASPIRE, a benchmark for vague-goal-driven self-evolution. ASPIRE provides only a natural-language capability goal while downstream evaluation tasks remain hidden. The agent must operationalize the goal by choosing data and update methods, constructing training and validation signals, and deciding when to evaluate. ASPIRE supports both model-weight and agent-harness evolution in a unified interactive environment and evaluates the resulting systems on a hidden, expert-authored set of 520 items spanning six goals. Our experiments show that vague goals redirect search effort toward goal interpretation. Current agents routinely complete training and harness-editing loops, but weight-level gains remain sparse and unstable, and the strongest evolved harness remains below the engineered Qwen-Agent reference. Agents often train on mismatched data and trust narrow self-evaluations, so local gains fail to transfer to hidden evaluation and continued search and training can erase earlier improvements.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/03/26, 03:49 AM

Paper page - Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.31111 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

ASPIRE introduces a benchmark for self-evolving LLM agents from vague natural-language goals, revealing challenges in goal interpretation, data selection, and stable weight-level improvement.

Many important forms of human learning begin with a vague goal, such as “become a better physicist” or “improve at research.” Learners must interpret the goal, identify capability gaps, decide how to learn, and determine whether they have actually improved. In contrast, existing work onLLM self-evolutiontypically begins with tasks and evaluation metrics specified by humans, reducing self-evolution to optimizing an explicit objective rather than deciding what and how to learn. We introduceASPIRE, a benchmark forvague-goal-driven self-evolution.ASPIREprovides only a natural-language capability goal while downstream evaluation tasks remain hidden. The agent must operationalize the goal by choosing data and update methods, constructing training and validation signals, and deciding when to evaluate.ASPIREsupports both model-weight andagent-harness evolutionin a unified interactive environment and evaluates the resulting systems on a hidden, expert-authored set of 520 items spanning six goals. Our experiments show that vague goals redirect search effort toward goal interpretation. Current agents routinely complete training and harness-editing loops, but weight-level gains remain sparse and unstable, and the strongest evolved harness remains below the engineered Qwen-Agent reference. Agents often train on mismatched data and trust narrowself-evaluations, so local gains fail to transfer tohidden evaluationand continued search and training can erase earlier improvements.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608\.31111

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.31111 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.31111 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.31111 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

SAGE: A Statistical Acceptance Gate for Self-Evolving Agents

arXiv cs.AI

The paper introduces SAGE, a statistical acceptance gate for LLM agents that self-evolve by editing persistent skill documents, using per-item paired comparisons and a one-sided paired test to prevent regressions and avoid the Optimizer's Curse, achieving lower regression rates and higher scores across five benchmarks and four backbone LLMs.