@modal: Nova got Opus 4.8 to edge past Fable 5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Modal Sandboxes let the team decouple Nova’s agent loop a…
Summary
Nova reports that its Agent OS, built with Modal Sandboxes, pushed Claude Opus 4.8 to 83.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1—edging out Fable 5's 83.8% without any fine-tuning, showing that agent orchestration can now rival frontier model capability.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/30/26, 11:19 AM
Nova got Opus 4.8 to edge past Fable 5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1.
Modal Sandboxes let the team decouple Nova’s agent loop and automatic review from tool execution, with fast startup and changes deployed in seconds to keep iteration quick.
The result: 83.9%, up five percentage points from Opus 4.8’s Claude Code baseline and just ahead of Fable 5’s 83.8%.
Carl Hasselskog (@CarlHasselskog): We made Opus 4.8 perform like Fable 5.
Same model. No fine-tuning.
Terminal-Bench 2.1: Opus 4.8 in Claude Code: 78.9% Opus 4.8 in Nova Agent OS: 83.9% Fable 5: 83.8% Built together with our friends at @modal. The frontier isn’t only the model anymore.
Similar Articles
@orca_build: Anthropic’s new Opus 4.8 scores 3.6% lower than GPT 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1… …but it’s noticeably better at UI tasks.…
Anthropic's Opus 4.8 scores 3.6% lower than GPT 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 but excels at UI tasks; Orca's orchestration enables Codex to delegate UI tasks to Claude Code.
ProgramBench result for Fable 5 is in, doubling Opus 4.8 even with 4.8 fallback "99% of the runs"
ProgramBench results show Fable 5 achieving double the performance of Opus 4.8, even with fallback to 4.8 in 99% of runs.
@robinebers: Fable 5 Low > Opus 4.8 Max
A user posts a comparison suggesting Fable 5 Low outperforms Opus 4.8 Max, with another user commenting that Fable 5 is back but being used incorrectly.
@RayFernando1337: Opus 5.5 Medium and I tell Claude Code to delegate subagents and easy work to Sonnet and it’s mind blowing how fast it …
A user shares that Claude Opus 5.5 Medium paired with Claude Code delegation of easy tasks to Sonnet subagents delivers surprisingly fast and accurate results, with the Claude desktop app's memory management greatly improved over terminal use.
@corbin_braun: wait... Opus 5.5 is better than Fable 5.1? is this true @grok
A tweet questions if Claude Opus 5.5 outperforms Fable 5.1, referencing Cursor's announcement that Opus 5.5 is now available as the top model on CursorBench with 40% lower costs.