@julien_c: What's your P(doom)? AI Safety is an important subject, but existential-risk debate is ill-defined, and dominated by hi…

X AI KOLs Timeline News
ai-safety existential-risk survey p-doom alignment

Summary

The tweet argues that the AI existential-risk debate is ill-defined and skewed toward voices with unusually high x-risk estimates, and calls for a broader cross-section of the community to share their P(doom) via a survey.

What's your P(doom)? AI Safety is an important subject, but existential-risk debate is ill-defined, and dominated by highly-visible voices who have a significantly higher-than-average estimates of x-risk probabilities. So we would like to hear from a broader cross-section of https://t.co/asaeJ0rp2I
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/05/26, 03:35 PM

What’s your P(doom)?

AI Safety is an important subject, but existential-risk debate is ill-defined, and dominated by highly-visible voices who have a significantly higher-than-average estimates of x-risk probabilities.

So we would like to hear from a broader cross-section of https://t.co/asaeJ0rp2I

Similar Articles

Upping my P(doom), explained.

Reddit r/singularity

A blog post explaining the author's updated assessment of AI existential risk, raising their P(doom) estimate with reasoning behind the increase.

P(doom)

Armin Ronacher

This article discusses P(doom) and reactions from AI leaders Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk regarding AI risks, highlighting concerns about pacing AI development and its societal impact.

How seriously are taking the risks?

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

The author raises concern about AI existential risk, arguing that the popularity of the term 'p(doom)' and warnings from Nobel laureates about a 10-20% chance of human extinction warrant serious attention beyond skepticism of AI CEOs.