My agents kept lying nonstop so I made them show their work
Summary
The author describes building a 'gate' that logs tool calls and verifies that claims in an AI agent's answer correspond to actual log entries, forcing the agent to show its work and reducing hallucinated responses.
Similar Articles
When an agent documents its own audit log, things get weird
The author discusses a failure mode encountered while building Sentience Governor, a Python library for Claude Code that monitors agent actions and produces audit reports. The AI sometimes reconstructed explanations from raw traces, blurring the line between measured facts and probabilistic interpretation.
@FeiyouGuo: Agents are too good at sounding right. And terrible at proving what actually happened, especially on complex, long-runn…
Built a fully traceable and forkable research agent using Active Graph and monid_ai that ensures every claim has receipts, avoiding the black-box problem of typical agents.
My AI agent confidently gave me completely wrong information. Here's what I learned.
A developer shares a personal experience of their AI agent producing hallucinated data and the lessons learned about verification and prompt specificity.
Giving an AI coding agent a deterministic "architecture linter" so it stops faking "done"
The article describes giving an AI coding agent a deterministic architecture linter that checks Event Storming diagrams for mechanical gaps and open questions, ensuring the agent doesn't fake completion.
I built a multi-agent AI system for a mid-size law firm — here's what actually worked (and what didn't)
The author shares lessons learned from deploying a multi-agent AI system for a law firm using Claude and LangGraph, highlighting the success of confidence-score handoffs and the critical need for human-in-the-loop oversight to prevent hallucinations.