If you are not Experimenting with Open weight. You should be. Especially if it's 18 times cheaper.

Reddit r/AI_Agents News

Summary

A Big Tech engineer compared building the same open-source library with DeepSeek V4-flash ($19.86) versus Opus 5.5 ($346.70), finding an 18x cost difference with acceptable results, arguing the industry should reconsider model rightsizing.

I work in Big tech and we have unlimited token counts for all the frontier models etc. this is a gift but also a bit of a vice. I am super detached from what it actually costs to build software with AI tools. But a couple weeks ago I was helping a friend out with some Open source library stuff (ArchUnitGo) and I decided to experiment with opencode. This got me thinking even more. Can a low parameter openweight model do what a frontier does given a solid harness? so I decided to build the library twice. Once with deep seek v4 flash and one with Opus 5.5. And the results are bananas. Same library built and here is the price difference. Opus 5.5: $346.70 V4-flash: $19.86 That's an 18 times price diff. Opus was obviously better overall and took about 40% less tokens to do it but at the end of the day who cares? It's cheap and it works if you use the simpler model. I think we need to really consider what model rightsizing means for the future.
Original Article

Similar Articles

The Unbearable Cheapness of Open Weight Models

Hacker News Top

The article examines the dramatic cost difference between open-weight models like DeepSeek V4 and closed models from Anthropic and OpenAI, arguing that the latter sustain high prices through artificial scarcity and branding rather than technical superiority.