@EricTopol: We're missing out on the value of genomics in medical practice. The cost (not charge) to do a polygenic risk score for …

X AI KOLs Following Papers

Summary

A new review in the New England Journal of Medicine highlights that polygenic risk scores for various diseases cost only $20 and are informative for high-risk individuals across ancestries, underscoring the underutilized value of genomics in medical practice.

We're missing out on the value of genomics in medical practice. The cost (not charge) to do a polygenic risk score for all these diseases (Figure) and more is only $20 and they are informative for high-risk (top 5%) across ancestries A new review @NEJM https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra2413201?query=featured_secondary_home…
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/24/26, 08:36 PM

We’re missing out on the value of genomics in medical practice. The cost (not charge) to do a polygenic risk score for all these diseases (Figure) and more is only $20 and they are informative for high-risk (top 5%) across ancestries A new review @NEJM https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra2413201?query=featured_secondary_home…

Similar Articles

GENEB: Why Genomic Models Are Hard to Compare

arXiv cs.CL

GENEB is a large-scale diagnostic benchmark that evaluates 40 genomic foundation models across 100 tasks in 13 functional categories under a unified probing protocol, exposing that aggregate leaderboards are unstable and that architectural alignment often outweighs model scale. The work addresses the fragmented evaluation landscape in genomic machine learning, analogous to what MTEB did for NLP.