Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
Summary
This paper proposes an adversarial social epistemology framework for analyzing trust, deception, and inference chains in communicative landscapes involving humans and large language models, and outlines mechanisms for auditing trust breaches.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/10/26, 06:05 AM
# Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07760](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07760) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.07760) > Abstract:We outline an adversarial social epistemology \(ASE\) for densely interactive communicative landscapes in which public assertions are scaffolded by chains of testimony, inference, institutional certification, and tacit trust\. In such landscapes, agents have incentives and affordances to distort, color, omit, fabricate, or strategically under\-specify information for private, reputational, rhetorical, or material gains\. We argue that these phenomena are not adequately captured by familiar descriptions of epistemic bubbles, echo chambers, or misinformation diffusion\. What requires explanation is how communicative agents exploit the commitments and entitlements that normally make scaffolded assertions trustworthy\. We provide language that delivers the requisite analysis, outline mechanisms that subvert trust in scaffolded public communications, and outline machinery for auditing and redressing trust breaches arising from subverting the auditability of inferential chains, drawing on epistemic networks, enriched with an inferentialist semantics for interpreting assertions\. ## Submission history From: Mihnea Moldoveanu \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8909ce20/2607.07760)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 8 Jul 2026 15:09:49 UTC \(412 KB\)
Similar Articles
Saying More Than They Know: A Framework for Quantifying Epistemic-Rhetorical Miscalibration in Large Language Models
Introduces a framework to quantify how LLMs overstate certainty through rhetorical devices, revealing model-agnostic patterns of epistemic-rhetorical miscalibration.
A Survey of Large Audio Language Models: Generalization, Trustworthiness, and Outlook
A comprehensive survey reviewing the trustworthiness challenges of Large Audio Language Models (LALMs), including vulnerabilities like cross-modal jailbreaking and acoustic backdoors, and proposing a defense-in-depth roadmap.
Evaluating Large Language Models in a Complex Hidden Role Game
This paper introduces an open-source framework to evaluate LLMs' reasoning, persuasion, and deception capabilities in the hidden role game Secret Hitler, finding that current models fail at sustained multi-turn manipulation while rule-based agents outperform them.
Building Social World Models with Large Language Models
The paper introduces the Social World Model (SWM) framework, which uses large language models to model the dynamics of social beliefs in response to events, without explicit annotations. It also presents a benchmark SWM-bench derived from prediction markets and shows state-of-the-art results.
Sequential statistical inference for Large Language Models: Representation, validity, and monitoring
This paper argues for a sequential inference framework to enhance LLM trustworthiness by modeling interactions as dependent stochastic processes, ensuring validity under repeated use, and enabling online monitoring for behavioral shifts.