Pre-2022 Books
Summary
A personal reflection on preferring pre-2022 books because they were written without AI assistance, questioning the value of human effort in the age of LLMs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/20/26, 11:18 PM
Similar Articles
LLMs and performative productivity
A developer reflects on using AI agents and questions whether the apparent productivity gains are genuine or merely performative, noting that while tasks are completed faster, deep understanding and real value may be lost.
Quoting Bryan Cantrill
Bryan Cantrill critiques LLMs for lacking the optimization constraint of human laziness, arguing that LLMs will unnecessarily complicate systems rather than improve them, and highlighting how human time limitations drive the development of efficient abstractions.
Replies to comments on my "LLMs are eroding my career" post
The author replies to comments on their viral post about LLMs eroding their software engineering career, discussing how AI automation is reducing the need for deep domain knowledge in fintech and the challenges of maintaining diligence in a vibecoding culture.
Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans
This study investigates the use of student-written counterarguments to AI-generated content to foster critical thinking in an educational context, and finds that frontier LLMs can evaluate such submissions with moderate agreement to human assessors.
Ask HN: Is the web for machines (/llm.txt) the one we wished we had as humans?
A reflection on how the machine-oriented /llm.txt files offer a simpler, clearer web experience that humans may also appreciate, speculating whether the AI revolution could improve the human web as a side effect.