@omooretweets: I was an early and enthusiastic adopter of AI browsers I don’t think the category is dead…but because switching costs a…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

A discussion on the current state of AI browsers, noting that while the category isn't dead, high switching costs require a 100x killer feature, and the rise of agentic capabilities in ChatGPT and Claude has eroded the initial value proposition of AI browsers.

I was an early and enthusiastic adopter of AI browsers I don’t think the category is dead…but because switching costs are quite high, you need a 100x killer feature Once agents in ChatGPT, Claude, etc got good at browser use - the first value prop of AI browsers was eroded
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/06/26, 02:07 PM

I was an early and enthusiastic adopter of AI browsers

I don’t think the category is dead…but because switching costs are quite high, you need a 100x killer feature

Once agents in ChatGPT, Claude, etc got good at browser use - the first value prop of AI browsers was eroded

mel (@melqtx): bro what happened to all those agentic browsers, one day they were gonna “autonomously browse the web, book flights, do research”, where are they now????

Similar Articles

Don't Switch to an AI Browser (Until You Watch This)

YouTube AI Channels

AI browsers like OpenAI's Atlas and Perplexity's Comet embed AI assistants directly into browsing with memory and agentic capabilities, but significant security risks from prompt injection attacks make them unsuitable for sensitive use.

@paulg: AI apps are the new browsers.

X AI KOLs Following

Paul Graham shares Austen Allred's observation that AI apps like Claude Code and Codex are increasingly becoming the primary interface for computer tasks, analogous to browsers in the past.