The four primitives that made my agents reliable: evidence-gated memory, counted evals, one governance gate, honest recursion
Summary
This article describes four primitives for building reliable AI agents: evidence-gated memory, counted evals, one governance gate, and honest recursion.
Similar Articles
An AI agent without a stop policy is just an expensive loop
A practical note on AI agent reliability, arguing that production agents need explicit gates for evidence thresholds, retry budgets, and impact assessment rather than relying on memory alone to determine task completion.
The Real Truth About AI Agents
An experienced practitioner shares hard-won lessons from deploying 25+ AI agents to production, arguing that memory, orchestration, and auditability matter far more than model choice. The article details common failure modes like context loss and silent cost loops, and recommends a stack including Claude Sonnet 4, Pydantic AI, and dedicated memory layers like Octopodas.
I stopped trying to build one super-agent and split it into 4 narrow agents. Reliability went way up.
The author describes improving AI agent reliability by replacing a single general-purpose agent with a four-agent workflow specializing in intake, research, action, and review. This shift prioritized system predictability and easier debugging over raw autonomy.
What do you treat as the first real safety gate before letting an agent take actions on its own?
Discusses a three-stage safety rollout for AI agents (observe, propose, execute within bounds) to separate reasoning from execution trust, and asks the community about their first hard gate for reducing failures.
How we make our AI growth agent as trustworthy as we can
The author describes how they make their AI growth agent Alice trustworthy by using deterministic code, fact-set verification, and scoped number matching, rather than relying on prompt rules. They share practical lessons for any agent that reports numbers to users.