@AstroHanRay: We ran an actual A/B benchmark test for active tool pruning, comparing 121 Terminal Bench tasks: - Performance: no regression (even slight improvement +2.48pp) - Token consumption: reduced by 41.7…

X AI KOLs Following Tools

Summary

A/B testing for agent active tool pruning shows: across 121 Terminal Bench tasks, performance slightly improves (+2.48 percentage points), token consumption reduces by 41.7%, and cost decreases by 31.6%.

We ran an actual A/B benchmark test for active tool pruning, comparing 121 Terminal Bench tasks: - Performance: no regression (even slight improvement +2.48pp) - Token consumption: reduced by 41.7% - Cost: reduced by 31.6%
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/28/26, 10:07 PM

We conducted an A/B benchmark test on active tool pruning, comparing 121 Terminal Bench tasks:

  • Performance: No regression (slight improvement of +2.48pp)
  • Token usage: Reduced by 41.7%
  • Cost: Reduced by 31.6%

kabikabi (@jakevin7): There’s an unspoken default assumption in building agents: the tool result is important, and the model must read the full text before continuing inference.

Recently, I discovered this assumption might be wrong.


https://t.co/3wF7yrD3ES — star welcome

In maka, we aggressively prune tool results

Similar Articles

@yibie: Recommends this hardcore real-world test. An engineer tracked his coding agent session for a week and found that only 0.67% of tokens were spent on actual tasks—the remaining 99% all went to moving tool directories, skill descriptions, and system prompts. Work-to-overhead ratio 1:1…

X AI KOLs Timeline

An engineer tracked his coding agent's token usage over a week, finding that only 0.67% of tokens were spent on actual tasks, with 99% consumed by tool directories, skill descriptions, and system prompts. He provides optimization strategies, including shell output filtering which saved 46.9% of tokens.

TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents

Hugging Face Daily Papers

TUA-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating general-purpose terminal-use agents across diverse digital activities and specialized workflows, revealing significant performance gaps among current frontier agents.