@interjc: Claude subscriptions now come with API credits, and for Max plans and above, it's basically a full refund.
Summary
Anthropic 将为 Max 和 Team 订阅计划附赠每月 Claude 平台 API 额度（Max 5x 为 $100，Max 20x 为 $200，Team 最高 $500 池化额度），可在任意模型及第三方工具中使用。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/08/26, 02:18 PM
Claude subscriptions now come with API credits, and for Max plans and above, it’s basically a full refund.
ClaudeDevs (@ClaudeDevs): We’re rolling out monthly Claude Platform API credits for Max and Team plans:
Max 5x: $100 Max 20x: $200 Team: up to $500, pooled
Works on any model, including Haiku 5.5, in your code or third-party harnesses.
How it works and full terms:
Similar Articles
@trq212: you now get Claude API credits with your MAX plans ($100, or 200 matching your plan) every month, use this to build mor…
Claude MAX plans now include monthly API credits ($100 or $200 depending on tier), enabling users to build personal AI tools; the author built an AI-generated homepage that replaces their Chrome new tab page based on sites they read.
@ClaudeDevs: Starting June 15, paid Claude plans can claim a dedicated monthly credit for programmatic usage. The credit covers usag…
Starting June 15, paid Claude plans will include a dedicated monthly credit for programmatic usage including Claude Agent SDK, claude -p, Claude Code GitHub Actions, and third-party apps built on the Agent SDK.
@jerryjliu0: lmao
Anthropic extends Claude model access on paid plans and keeps Claude Code's weekly rate limits 50% higher through July 19.
What will you do? Pending June 15 Claude Subscription Changes.
Anthropic is changing its Claude subscription policy on June 15, 2025, so that subscribers can no longer use their subscription to power agents via the API; instead, they will receive credits equivalent to their subscription value for API usage.
Is Claude Code going to cost $100/month? Probably not—it’s all very confusing
Anthropic briefly updated its pricing page to show Claude Code as exclusive to $100–200/month Max plans, causing user outrage before reverting the change and claiming it was a limited test.