@GitHub_Daily: AI-research-feedback, an academic paper review skill for Claude Code. It can run six review agents simultaneously, checking grammar, coherence, formulas, figures, and argument flaws. You can also specify journals like QJE, AER, simulating the corresponding reviewer's pickiness, and finally combine…
Summary
AI-research-feedback is an academic paper review skill for Claude Code. It checks grammar, coherence, formulas, figures, and argument flaws through six parallel agents, supports specifying journals to simulate reviewers, and finally generates a structured review report.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/03/26, 10:34 AM
AI-research-feedback, an academic paper review skill for Claude Code.
The core can run six review agents simultaneously, targeting grammar, consistency, equations, figures/tables, and argument flaws.
It can also specify journals such as QJE, AER to simulate the corresponding reviewer’s strictness, and finally synthesize a structured review report.
GitHub:http://github.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback…
Besides full review, there are lightweight quick-check version, paper-code consistency check, and grant proposal review.
Install with a single curl command, can directly read LaTeX source files for review, and supports economics and finance journals.
claesbackman/AI-research-feedback
Source: https://github.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback
Using AI to get feedback on your research
A collection of Claude Code (https://claude.ai/code) skills for academic research review. This tool was developed by Claes Bäckman (https://claesbackman.com).
Skills in this folder
Skills/review-paper.md: Full referee-style paper review command.Skills/review-paper-light.md: Fast 2-agent paper check.Skills/review-paper-code.md: Paper-code reproducibility and alignment review.Skills/review-pap.md: Pre-analysis plan review command.Skills/review-grant.md: Grant proposal review command.
Skills
review-paper — Pre-Submission Referee Report
Runs a rigorous pre-submission review of an academic paper, simulating the scrutiny of a specific journal’s editorial board. Six specialized review agents run in parallel and consolidate their findings into a single structured report.
What it reviews:
| Agent | Focus |
|---|---|
| 1 | Spelling, grammar, and academic style |
| 2 | Internal consistency and cross-reference verification |
| 3 | Unsupported claims and identification integrity |
| 4 | Mathematics, equations, and notation |
| 5 | Tables, figures, and their documentation |
| 6 | Contribution evaluation (adversarial journal-specific referee) |
Installation:
bash mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -o ~/.claude/commands/review-paper.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-paper.md
For a project-local install:
bash mkdir -p .claude/commands && curl -o .claude/commands/review-paper.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-paper.md
Usage:
text /review-paper /review-paper QJE /review-paper JF path/to/main.tex
Supported journals:
| Category | Journals |
|---|---|
| Top-5 economics | AER, QJE, JPE, Econometrica, REStud |
| Finance | JF, JFE, RFS, JFQA |
| Macro | AEJMacro, JME, RED |
If no journal is specified, the command applies high general standards without a specific journal persona. If no path is provided, it auto-detects the main .tex file.
Output:
Saves a consolidated report to PRE_SUBMISSION_REVIEW_[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current directory, automatically appending -v2, -v3, and so on if a file already exists.
Customization:
- Add journals or fields by editing the recognized journal names list in the skill file.
- Add project-specific context in your prompt or in a local
CLAUDE.mdfile. - Adjust folder discovery or save paths directly in the skill if your project structure differs from the default assumptions.
Requirements:
- Claude Code (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) with access to the
general-purposesubagent. - A LaTeX paper. The skill reads
.texfiles and optionally inspects figure and table files.
review-paper-light — Quick Paper Check
Runs a fast 2-agent pre-submission check for an economics paper. It focuses on contribution, identification, causal overclaiming, and unsupported claims, and is designed for quick iteration before a full review.
Installation:
bash mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -o ~/.claude/commands/review-paper-light.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-paper-light.md
For a project-local install:
bash mkdir -p .claude/commands && curl -o .claude/commands/review-paper-light.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-paper-light.md
Usage:
text /review-paper-light /review-paper-light path/to/main.tex
If no path is provided, the command auto-detects the main .tex file.
Output:
Saves a short prioritized report to QUICK_REVIEW_[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current directory, automatically versioning the filename if one already exists.
Requirements:
- Claude Code (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) with access to the
general-purposesubagent. - A LaTeX paper.
review-paper-code — Paper-Code Reproducibility Review
Runs a paper-code review for empirical research projects. It discovers the main LaTeX paper and analysis code, checks reproducibility and code quality, maps the paper’s main empirical claims to the code, and writes a constructive report highlighting strengths, gaps to verify, and concrete next steps.
What it reviews:
| Area | Focus |
|---|---|
| Paper discovery | Main .tex file and included sections |
| Code discovery | Stata, R, and Python scripts in common analysis folders |
| Reproducibility | Paths, seeds, outputs, dependencies, run order, documentation |
| Code quality | Structure, commented-out code, opaque transforms, major thresholds |
| Paper-code alignment | Tables, variables, sample restrictions, methods, clustering, fixed effects |
Usage:
text /review-paper-code /review-paper-code path/to/main.tex /review-paper-code path/to/main.tex path/to/code_dir /review-paper-code path/to/main.tex path/to/code_dir full
Review depth:
main: default; focuses on main scripts and core outputsfull: reviews all detected code files in scope
Output:
Writes a report to code_review_report.md in the current working directory.
Requirements:
- Claude Code (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) with access to the
general-purposesubagent. - A LaTeX paper plus Stata, R, or Python analysis code.
review-pap — Pre-Analysis Plan Review
Runs a 6-agent pre-submission review of a pre-analysis plan (PAP). The command auto-detects the main PAP and supporting files, then evaluates writing quality, specification completeness, internal consistency, identification strategy, statistical analysis, implementation details, and registry or journal fit.
Installation:
bash mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -o ~/.claude/commands/review-pap.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-pap.md
For a project-local install:
bash mkdir -p .claude/commands && curl -o .claude/commands/review-pap.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-pap.md
Usage:
text /review-pap /review-pap AEA /review-pap QJE path/to/pap.tex
Supported targets:
- Trial registries:
AEA,EGAP,OSF,ClinicalTrials,ISRCTN - Journal standards:
AER,QJE,JPE,RESTUD,AEJ,JEEA - General standards:
top-journal,working-paper
If no target is specified, the command defaults to top-journal. If no path is provided, it auto-detects the main PAP file.
Supporting files it can inspect:
- Power calculations and sample-size worksheets
- Survey instruments and questionnaires
- Randomization protocols and sampling frames
- Code skeletons and mock tables
- Data dictionaries and ethics materials
Output:
Saves a consolidated report to PAP_REVIEW_[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current directory.
Requirements:
- Claude Code (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) with access to the
general-purposesubagent. - A PAP in a readable format such as
.md,.txt, or.tex. The skill can also attempt to work with.pdfand.docx, while noting accessibility limitations if needed.
review-grant — Grant Proposal Review
Runs a 6-agent pre-submission panel review of a grant proposal. The command auto-detects the main proposal and supporting documents, then evaluates clarity, compliance signals, internal consistency, significance, innovation, research design, feasibility, budget logic, team readiness, and fit to the target funder or program.
Installation:
bash mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -o ~/.claude/commands/review-grant.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-grant.md
For a project-local install:
bash mkdir -p .claude/commands && curl -o .claude/commands/review-grant.md \ https://raw.githubusercontent.com/claesbackman/AI-research-feedback/main/Skills/review-grant.md
Usage:
text /review-grant /review-grant NSF /review-grant NIH path/to/proposal.pdf
Supported funders/programs:
- US federal science and health:
NSF,NIH,ERC,HorizonEurope - General proposal standards:
major-funder,foundation
If no target is specified, the command defaults to major-funder. If no path is provided, it auto-detects the main proposal file.
Supporting files it can inspect:
- Budgets and budget justifications
- Timelines and workplans
- Biosketches, CVs, and personnel documents
- Data-management plans, mentoring plans, and facilities statements
- Letters of support, appendices, and supplementary materials
Output:
Saves a consolidated report to GRANT_PROPOSAL_REVIEW_[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current directory.
Requirements:
- Claude Code (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) with access to the
general-purposesubagent. - A proposal in a readable format such as
.md,.txt, or.tex. The skill can also attempt to work with.pdfand.docx, while noting accessibility limitations if needed.
License
MIT — free to use, adapt, and share.
Similar Articles
@gaoren7716: Writing a thesis? It might get rewritten by a systematic AI system. Not just polishing or rewriting a sentence – from topic selection onward, there are 13 agents collaborating. Feature list: Deep Research (13-agent research team), Systematic Review (P…
Introduces an open-source AI tool called Academic Research Skills that automates the entire academic research process from topic selection to writing and peer review through collaboration of 13 agents. It can be installed as a Claude Code plugin, turning academic research into a standardized production line.
@geekbb: 覆盖 200+ 主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊论文写作技能包,从选题到审稿回复全流程都有。 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills…
一份覆盖200+主流期刊的Claude Code/Codex期刊论文写作技能包,包含从选题到审稿回复的全流程,开源在GitHub上。
@wsl8297: The biggest fear when writing a paper with AI is not being unable to produce content, but that it looks complete while the research gap, literature support, and argument structure are actually unsound. Academic Paper Skills solves this problem. GitHub: https://github.com/lishix520/…
Academic Paper Skills is a paper writing skill framework for Claude Code, dividing the writing process into two phases: strategy and composition. It incorporates features like literature support, reviewer simulation, and quality checks to help users generate a first draft from a research idea.
@QingQ77: An integrated AI academic skills package for Chinese researchers, covering three scenarios: paper writing, academic Office document generation, and scientific computing. https://github.com/zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills… Three skills…
An integrated AI academic skills package for Chinese researchers, including three scenarios: paper writing, academic Office document generation, and scientific computing. It can be used directly with Claude Code and Codex.
@GitHub_Daily: Articles written with AI always have an AI vibe: neat sentence structures, repetitive wording. After publishing or submitting, you worry about being detected. Recently, I stumbled upon an open-source tool called AI Humanize Text, specifically designed to rewrite AI-generated text into a more natural human writing style. It offers four different rewriting approaches…
Introduces an open-source tool called AI Humanize Text, which uses methods like multilingual translation chains, multi-round rewriting by large models, etc., to rewrite AI-generated text to be more natural and avoid detection.