Trump's forced coal plant extensions thrown out by judge

Ars Technica News

Summary

A court has voided the Department of Energy's emergency orders that forced coal plants to stay open, rejecting federal intervention in generation facilities and potentially reversing multiple similar actions from the Trump administration.

<p>The use of coal to generate electricity on the US grid has been plunging for nearly two decades, and the first Trump administration was unable to affect the trend. So his second administration has attempted <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/trump-admin-tries-again-to-revive-dying-coal-industry/">more aggressive interventions</a> to prop up coal use. One of its most direct means of doing so is to order coal plants that were scheduled to close <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/12/trump-admin-orders-another-coal-plant-to-stay-open/">to remain open</a>, even if <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/03/coal-plant-forced-to-stay-open-due-to-emergency-order-isnt-even-running/">there is no need for them</a>.</p> <p>The administration's justification for these orders is a statute that allows the Department of Energy (DOE) to declare an emergency in the case of wartime or a sudden shortfall in generation. A number of parties, including states where coal plants have been slated to close, have challenged this declaration. And on Friday, in the first of these cases to make its way through the courts, the declaration was judged to be contrary to the statute. While this only affects a single coal plant in Michigan, the reasoning of the decision will apply to every coal plant closure that has been blocked by the DOE.</p> <h2>No emergency</h2> <p><a href="https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/09/25-1159-2192454.pdf">The decision</a> was issued by a unanimous three-judge panel from the DC Circuit's Court of Appeals. It focuses on the J.H. Campbell Generating Plant, which was scheduled to close last year but has been kept open by a total of five emergency declarations by the DOE, each limited to 90 days by the Federal Power Act. At issue was section 202(c) of that Act, which allows the DOE to declare emergencies when the US is at war or when “an emergency exists by reason of a sudden increase in the demand for electric energy, or a shortage of electric energy.”</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/court-rejects-governments-energy-emergency-that-kept-coal-plant-open/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/court-rejects-governments-energy-emergency-that-kept-coal-plant-open/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/11/26, 11:23 PM

# Trump's forced coal plant extensions thrown out by judge Source: [https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/court-rejects-governments-energy-emergency-that-kept-coal-plant-open/](https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/09/court-rejects-governments-energy-emergency-that-kept-coal-plant-open/) ## Not the DOE’s job The court spends a fair bit of time analyzing the history and structure of the regulation of the US electric grid\. With very little in the way of exceptions, this leaves regulation of generating capacity to the states; the federal government only gets involved when it comes to interstate transmission lines\. It notes that the same Federal Power Act that’s at issue here, for example, “expressly denies \[Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\] authority to regulate generation facilities directly\.” The court interprets this as an indication that Congress had intended for federal intervention at the level of generation facilities to be rare and only in cases where there was an immediate shortfall that could only be addressed through federal action\. And it notes that this is exactly how the authority had been used throughout its history\. “Indeterminate assertions of summer electricity shortfalls are not what Congress meant by ’emergency,’” the judges conclude\. Here, in contrast, we had a carefully planned closure that included ensuring a newer generating facility compensated for the plant’s closure\. “Permitting DOE to compel generation in a situation that can be resolved through the ordinary resource adequacy planning mechanisms or a request under section 202\(b\) would render meaningless the constraints on federal power that Congress imposed throughout the Act,” the decision concludes\. As a result, the court voided the DOE’s emergency declaration\. Barring an appeal, this means that Michigan can finally continue with its planned shutdown process, relieving the local ratepayers from the costs incurred to maintain the coal plant to a state where it could be brought back online\. Perhaps more significantly, however, is that the same logic will apply to all other cases where the DOE has attempted to force plants to stay open\. So, as long as someone is willing to challenge them and the decision doesn’t get overturned on appeal, it’s likely that all the other coal plants the Trump administration has kept open, and possibly its other actions under the same emergency authority, will be reversed\. According to the DOE, it has issued[over 55 emergency orders](https://www.energy.gov/ceser/2026-doe-202c-orders)in 2026 alone\. \(For the curious, that’s more than double the total number issued between 2000 and 2025\.\)

Similar Articles

Trump is losing his war on wind power

Ars Technica

A US District Court ordered the Department of Defense to resume participation in wind project approval processes, striking down the Trump administration's attempt to halt wind development over national security claims.

Trump tried to curb clean energy. It’s booming anyway.

Ars Technica

Despite efforts by the Trump administration to curb clean energy, it continues to boom due to demand from data centers, court interventions, and economic incentives. Growth is driven by solar and wind power, with consumer investment and policy factors contributing to the surge.

Trump admin tries again to revive dying coal industry

Ars Technica

The Trump administration announced a renewed effort to revive the US coal industry, despite coal becoming one of the most expensive and polluting energy sources. The announcement was made during a press event that also discussed unrelated topics.

Trump wants the power to stop the public from suing polluters

Ars Technica

The Trump administration's DOJ is asking a court to dismiss an NAACP citizen suit against xAI over unpermitted gas turbines powering its Colossus 2 data center, arguing that citizen lawsuits threaten AI innovation and national security. This marks a significant legal effort to expand executive power over environmental enforcement.