The Plot Thins: Uniformity and Linearity in Literary Summaries
Summary
This paper examines the concepts of uniformity and linearity in literary summaries, analyzing their prevalence and implications for narrative structure.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/19/26, 09:53 AM
# Untitled Document Source: [https://arxiv.org/html/2608.17218](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.17218) ## Instructions for reporting errors We are continuing to improve HTML versions of papers, and your feedback helps enhance accessibility and mobile support\. To report errors in the HTML that will help us improve conversion and rendering, choose any of the methods listed below: - Click the "Report Issue"\(\)button, located in the page header\. **Tip:**You can select the relevant text first, to include it in your report\. Our team has already identified[the following issues](https://github.com/arXiv/html_feedback/issues)\. We appreciate your time reviewing and reporting rendering errors we may not have found yet\. Your efforts will help us improve the HTML versions for all readers, because disability should not be a barrier to accessing research\. Thank you for your continued support in championing open access for all\. Have a free development cycle? Help support accessibility at arXiv\! Our collaborators at LaTeXML maintain a[list of packages that need conversion](https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/wiki/Porting-LaTeX-packages-for-LaTeXML), and welcome[developer contributions](https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues)\.
Similar Articles
Whose Story Gets Told? Positionality and Bias in LLM Summaries of Life Narratives
Columbia and Northwestern researchers propose a pipeline to surface race and gender bias in LLM abstractive summaries of life-story interviews, showing representational harm risks.
A Geometric Profile of Semantic Information in Text: Frame-Conditional Uniqueness and a Trade-Off Triangle for Scalar Summaries
This paper develops a geometric framework to measure semantic content of texts using sentence embeddings, proposing a three-coordinate semantic profile (novelty, breadth, integration) and a scalar trade-off triangle, validated across synthetic categories and novels.
Can LLM Agents Stick to the Script? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Consistency in Interactive Narratives
This paper introduces NCP-Bench, a benchmark derived from 100 movie synopses for evaluating long-horizon narrative consistency in LLM-based interactive storytelling agents. Experiments show that even strong models like GPT-5.2 struggle to maintain logical consistency, with a 42% survival rate after 20 turns and high fact conflict rates.
No Reader Left Behind: Multi-Agent Summaries Everyone Can Understand
The paper introduces NRLB, a multi-agent framework for plain language summarization that simulates diverse reader groups (elementary school, non-native, attention deficits) to improve readability while maintaining factual accuracy, validated across multiple datasets and human evaluations.
Do Large Language Models Always Tell The Same Stories?
This paper investigates whether large language models generate diverse stories. Using narrative similarity analysis, the authors find that LLM-generated narratives are consistently more similar to each other than human-written stories, and that common mitigation strategies like negative prompting and temperature scaling fail to address this homogeneity.