Don't Go Breaking My LLM: The Impact of Pruning Attention Layers on Explanation Faithfulness and Confidence Calibration
Summary
This paper studies how pruning attention layers in LLMs affects explanation faithfulness and confidence calibration, finding that accuracy often remains high but interpretability and reliability degrade, highlighting a misalignment between model confidence, interpretability, and accuracy.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/25/26, 05:08 AM
# Don't Go Breaking My LLM: The Impact of Pruning Attention Layers on Explanation Faithfulness and Confidence Calibration Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24970](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24970) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24970) > Abstract:Pruning Large Language Models \(LLMs\) reduces memory and inference costs by removing parts of the network, producing smaller models that retain most of their accuracy\. As attention layers are the most resource\-intensive parts of LLMs, pruning them is a promising compression strategy\. Prior work shows that up to 33% of attention layers can be pruned with minimal accuracy loss\. Nevertheless, the impact of attention pruning on model interpretability, specifically faithfulness and confidence calibration, remains unstudied\. To address this gap, we study how pruning attention layers affects explanation faithfulness and confidence calibration across five LLMs and eight datasets\. While the pruned models often maintain high accuracy, we find that their faithfulness and calibration often degrade\. Notably, faithfulness and calibration can fluctuate significantly, even when accuracy remains stable, highlighting a misalignment between model confidence, interpretability, and accuracy\. Our findings suggest that layer pruning can affect LLMs' interpretability and reliability in ways not captured by accuracy and efficiency measures alone\. We recommend including explainability and calibration metrics when evaluating pruned models\. ## Submission history From: Pietro Tropeano \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/87a97d7a/2606.24970)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:07:59 UTC \(2,526 KB\)
Similar Articles
What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness
This paper probes internal representations of LLM forecasters to improve calibration and assess faithfulness of chain-of-thought reasoning, finding that probes achieve better calibration and act as lie detectors.
Calibrating Overconfidence Without Sacrificing Confidence: Probe-Conditioned Head Intervention for LLMs
The paper introduces Probe-Conditioned Head Intervention (PCHI), an inference-time method for LLMs that selectively reduces overconfidence on wrong answers without significantly reducing confidence on correct ones, by conditionally rescaling attention head outputs when the model is likely wrong but confident.
Understanding Performance Collapse in Layer-Pruned Large Language Models via Decision Representation Transitions
This paper analyzes performance collapse in layer-pruned LLMs by introducing decision representation metrics, identifying a 'Silent Phase' critical for maintaining model integrity.
When Correct Beliefs Collapse: Epistemic Resilience of LLMs under Clinical Pressure
This paper investigates how large language models maintain correct beliefs under adversarial pressure in clinical settings, proposing R-FT fine-tuning to improve epistemic resilience while balancing corrigibility, and demonstrating significant robustness gains on medical benchmarks.
When Compression Scores Cannot Decide: Information Boundaries for Group-Robust LLM Pruning
This paper analyzes why compression statistics for LLM pruning can be reproducible yet select suboptimal endpoints, introducing information boundaries and observation fibers to model the gap. It proposes group-resolved and model-specific mask selection methods that improve worst-group perplexity across dense LLMs and OLMoE.