CAST: Critique-Aware Supervision for Training Reliable Long-Horizon Tool-Calling Agents
Summary
CAST is a critique-aware training framework that improves LLM agent reliability by generating structured action-level rationales from sparse outcomes, outperforming GPT-OSS-120B on tool-calling benchmarks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/01/26, 11:52 AM
Paper page - CAST: Critique-Aware Supervision for Training Reliable Long-Horizon Tool-Calling Agents
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.30147 Published on Aug 31
·
Submitted byhttps://huggingface.co/sahsaeedi
Amiron Sep 1
Abstract
CAST improves LLM agent reliability by generating structured action-level rationales from sparse outcomes to train critique and policy models.
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in long-horizon, interactive, and stateful environments. In these settings, a single wrong action, such as refunding the wrong purchase, can cause irreversible task failure and must be intercepted before execution. Such failures may not appear in every single run, but can emerge across repeated trials, making reliability across steps and trials critical. However, ensuring agentic reliability is challenging: even frontier LLMs struggle to explain why an action may be wrong, especially in long, intertwined trajectories governed by domain-specific policies. Much recent work relies on prompt-based critique agents, while optimization-based methods lack a systematic way to produce rich verification rationales for training. We address this gap with CAST, acritique-aware trainingframework that converts sparse task outcomes intoaction-level supervisionfor critique learning andpolicy optimization. CAST analyzes agent trajectories to synthesizestructured rationalesexplaining action validity underpartial observability. The resultingcritique modelis used to constructcritique-aware trainingdata for optimizing the policy model. Fine-tuningQwen3-family models ondynamic tool-callingbenchmarks, CAST improves reliability across domains, outperforming GPT-OSS-120B by over 10% pass^4 on Retail tasks and yielding an additional 9% improvement on Telehealth in an out-of-domain setting. These results demonstrate thatcritique-aware trainingimproves the robustness of LLM agents in realistic dynamic environments.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.30147 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.30147 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.30147 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
CAST: Game Solvers as Turn-Level Teachers for LLM Agents
CAST is a method that uses game solver state values to provide turn-level credit assignment signals for training LLM agents via reinforcement learning, outperforming baselines across multiple games in both in-domain and unseen-difficulty evaluations.
@omarsar0: Cool paper from Apple. Most evaluation of tool-calling agents happens after the trajectory is over. By then the wrong c…
This Apple research paper introduces 'Reinforced Agent,' a method that moves evaluation into the execution loop using a specialized reviewer agent to correct tool-calling errors in real-time. It demonstrates significant accuracy improvements on benchmarks like BFCL and τ²-Bench without retraining the base agent.
Beyond Function Calling: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents under Tool-Environment Unreliability
Introduces ToolBench-X, a benchmark for evaluating large language model agents under various tool-environment reliability hazards, revealing a substantial gap in performance compared to clean environments.
Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents
This paper synthesizes 27 benchmark, taxonomy, and audit papers from 2023-2026 into a unified taxonomy of LLM agent limitations, identifying six failure clusters including tool invocation errors, planning failures, long-horizon degradation, multi-agent coordination issues, safety concerns, and measurement validity problems.
Can LLM Agents Stick to the Script? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Consistency in Interactive Narratives
This paper introduces NCP-Bench, a benchmark derived from 100 movie synopses for evaluating long-horizon narrative consistency in LLM-based interactive storytelling agents. Experiments show that even strong models like GPT-5.2 struggle to maintain logical consistency, with a 42% survival rate after 20 turns and high fact conflict rates.