When Does Machine Learning Beat Value Sorting? A Three-Dataset Diagnostic of Exposure-Weighted Shipment Prioritization
Summary
This paper investigates when machine learning outperforms traditional value sorting for exposure-weighted shipment prioritization using three datasets.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/22/26, 08:22 AM
# When Does Machine Learning Beat Value Sorting? A Three-Dataset Diagnostic of Exposure-Weighted Shipment Prioritization Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18573](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18573) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
A Systematic Evaluation of Imbalance Handling Methods in Biomedical Binary Classification
This paper systematically evaluates five imbalance handling methods (RUS, ROS, SMOTE, re-weighting, direct F1 optimization) on three biomedical datasets (tabular, text, image) using models of varying complexity. Results show that benefits depend on model complexity and data modality, with ROS, re-weighting, and direct F1 optimization being effective for complex models on unstructured data.
Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Minority-Class Financial Distress Prediction Under Class Imbalance Constraints
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of classical, ensemble, and neural machine learning approaches for predicting financial distress under severe class imbalance, using SMOTE for oversampling and SHAP for interpretability.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Learning for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction: Large-Scale External Validation and Fairness Analysis
This paper develops a multi-dimensional framework to evaluate discrimination, calibration, interpretability, and algorithmic fairness for machine learning-based type 2 diabetes risk prediction models, revealing significant performance degradation under real-world distribution shifts and biases by age and obesity.
Aligning Data-Driven Predictors with Allocation: A Decision-Focused Approach to Survival Analysis
This paper introduces a decision-focused learning approach for survival analysis that aligns predictive models with downstream allocation decisions, using NDCG optimization. Applied to US heart transplant data, it improves ranking performance by 50-100%, potentially yielding thousands of additional life-years annually.
A Comparative Study of Bayesian Contextual Bandits for Real-Time Warehouse Sorter Optimization
This paper presents a comparative study of Bayesian Contextual Bandits, XGBoost, and Linear Regression for real-time sorter diversion optimization in e-commerce warehouses, showing BCB achieves 2.03% reward uplift with superior online learning and inference latency.