@rohanpaul_ai: atomic[.]chat (a desktop app that runs LLMs locally) ran a very revealing comparison for local AI agents, on a MacBook …

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Liquid's LFM2.5-8B-A1B outperformed OpenAI's gpt-oss-20b on a tool-calling benchmark when run locally on a MacBook Pro, completing all required tool calls in half the time while using less memory.

atomic[.]chat (a desktop app that runs LLMs locally) ran a very revealing comparison for local AI agents, on a MacBook Pro M5 Max, 64GB. Liquid’s much smaller LFM2.5-8B-A1B beat gpt-oss-20b by finishing every required tool call, cutting runtime by more than half, and using 4.8GB https://t.co/89GRmfJeJk
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/31/26, 06:40 AM

atomic[.]chat (a desktop app that runs LLMs locally) ran a very revealing comparison for local AI agents, on a MacBook Pro M5 Max, 64GB.

Liquid’s much smaller LFM2.5-8B-A1B beat gpt-oss-20b by finishing every required tool call, cutting runtime by more than half, and using 4.8GB https://t.co/89GRmfJeJk

atomic.chat (@atomic_chat_hq): Liquid’s LFM2.5-8B-A1B smashed OpenAI’s gpt-oss-20b on tool calling

We ran both locally on a MacBook Pro M5 Max, 64GB, and gave each the same trip-planning request that only completes if the model fires all 7 tool calls - weather for 3 cities, two currency conversions, an email

Similar Articles

Localmaxxing (3 minute read)

TLDR AI

The article analyzes the viability of running AI inference locally on a MacBook Pro, comparing a local Qwen 35B model against the cloud-based Claude Opus 4.5. It concludes that local models are 2x faster for routine tasks, making them a practical choice for half of daily workloads despite a slight capability gap.