@GergelyOrosz: Both AWS’s Kiro and GitHub Workflows was built on the idea of spec-driven development (you or the agent writes a spec f…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

A tweet discusses why spec-driven development, as used in AWS Kiro and GitHub Workflows, failed to gain traction, referencing an analysis by @dexhorthy.

Both AWS’s Kiro and GitHub Workflows was built on the idea of spec-driven development (you or the agent writes a spec first, then it implements it). And it just… hasn’t stuck. Good take from @dexhorthy on why not
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/25/26, 10:04 AM

Both AWS’s Kiro and GitHub Workflows was built on the idea of spec-driven development (you or the agent writes a spec first, then it implements it). And it just… hasn’t stuck.

Good take from @dexhorthy on why not

The Pragmatic Engineer (@Pragmatic_Eng): Why did spec-driven development never take off - the workflow tools like Amazon’s Kiro or GitHub Workspaces encouraged? @dexhorthy, founder of HumanLayer:

“These projects have a really interesting idea: you maintain a set of specifications for your software, and then you

Similar Articles

@zachlloydtweets: https://x.com/zachlloydtweets/status/2065154860337508577

X AI KOLs Timeline

The article outlines a five-step workflow for spec-driven development using Warp skills: write a product spec (PRODUCT.md), write a tech spec (TECH.md), implement with any AI agent, validate implementation matches specs, and validate using computer use with Oz. The skills are open-sourced and can be installed via npx.