What impedes apps using AI to make the user’s device the server running a local LLM?
Summary
A user reflects on why more apps don’t run local LLMs directly on phones, noting Gemma 2-4B models already work offline and could eliminate server costs while maintaining near-GPT-4o quality.
Similar Articles
We built an app that runs AI completely offline on your phone (Local LLMs). Perfect for flights, camping, or dead zones.
Introduces Cortex AI, an app that runs AI completely offline on phones using optimized local models, addressing privacy and connectivity issues.
@rohanpaul_ai: Gemma 4 (specifically its edge-optimized E2B and E4B variants) running fully offline on an iPhone via apps like Locally…
Google’s Gemma 4 E2B/E4B quantized variants now run fully offline on iPhone via apps like Locally AI, leveraging the Apple Neural Engine for on-device inference.
Local AI needs to be the norm
The article argues against relying on cloud-hosted AI APIs due to privacy and reliability concerns, advocating for on-device AI processing as demonstrated by a native iOS app using Apple's local model APIs.
@DeRonin_: My current local AI setup: - 2x DGX Spark linked (256gb) > GLM 5.2 @ 2bit, reasoning + agent loops - Mac Studio M3 Ultr…
A user describes their fully local AI stack using multiple hardware devices running Chinese models like GLM, Qwen, and Kimi, claiming 87% cost savings compared to frontier models like GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8, while noting plans to self-host video generation.
Why can't people just run gemini and claude code using their own gpus?
A commentary questioning why users cannot run Gemini and Claude Code locally on their own GPUs, implying compute cost constraints are limiting access to these AI models.