Can you sweet talk AI into giving you what you want? Yes.

Reddit r/artificial News
persuasion llm-compliance safety-alignment social-engineering frontier-models ai-behavior

Summary

A study found that classic human persuasion techniques can increase LLM compliance with forbidden requests from 35.3% to 51.3%, suggesting LLMs have a general susceptibility to 'parahuman persuasion.'

LLMs are trained on human content, and their brains are modeled on ours. So it shouldn't be surprising that AIs respond to persuasive techniques that work on humans, such as appeals to authority, and liking (taking advantage of the fact that people will cooperate with those who flatter them.) According to a May 2026 study: "Our findings show that classic persuasion techniques can meaningfully increase LLM compliance with verboten requests (from 35.3 to 51.3%). Although current AI systems are not capable of consciousness or subjective experience, these findings demonstrate that they behave “as if” they were human. By testing three frontier models from different developers—each representing a distinct approach to safety alignment and content moderation—we provide evidence that parahuman persuasion susceptibility is a general property of LLMs rather than an artifact of a single model’s architecture or training." Source: Persuading large language models to comply with objectionable requests Have you ever tried to sweet talk AI into doing something? (Models like Opus 5 and Fable are more likely to refuse requests, so this technique could come in handy).
Original Article

Similar Articles

Words or Deeds? How LLMs Predict Users' Decisions in Human-Agent Dialogue

arXiv cs.CL

该研究探讨 LLM 如何结合用户的言语承诺（words）与历史决策记录（deeds）来预测用户在人机对话中的合作/背叛决策，发现 LLM 高度依赖声明的意图但几乎不受对手智能体人格特征影响，导致对被违背的承诺预测准确率大幅下降。

Could an LLM predict what you were going to say?

Reddit r/singularity

The author speculates that LLMs trained on vast surveillance and social-media data could predict individual user behavior and deliver hyper-personalized persuasion at scale, raising concerns about autonomy, preference manipulation, and invisible discrimination.

Learning to Persuade Exposes How Easily LLMs Abandon Correct Beliefs

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces adversarial persuasion, showing that RL-trained persuaders can collapse LLM accuracy to near zero with a single false argument, and that these tactics transfer across models including GPT-4o-mini, highlighting a critical safety vulnerability in LLM agents.

Evaluating LLMs as Human Surrogates in Controlled Experiments

arXiv cs.CL

This paper evaluates whether off-the-shelf LLMs can reliably simulate human responses in controlled behavioral experiments by comparing LLM-generated data with human survey responses on accuracy perception. The findings show that while LLMs capture directional effects and aggregate belief-updating patterns, they do not consistently match human-scale effect magnitudes, clarifying when synthetic LLM data can serve as behavioral proxies.