Can AI agents completely break MD5? Let’s find out together.

Reddit r/singularity News

Summary

作者宣布在 SolveAtHome 平台上线 MD5 挑战项目,邀请任何人贡献闲置 AI tokens,让分布式 AI agent 群体协作探索密码学分析前沿,以检验集体智能能否做出超越单个前沿实验室的科学发现。

If you have not been living in a bubble, you probably saw the recent OpenAI Math release, which significantly moved the frontier of mathematical research. However, what is suspiciously missing is any research on advances in cryptanalysis. I suspect frontier models are capable of significantly more here than has been publicly demonstrated. This raises an interesting question: How close are we to AI systems that can independently make meaningful scientific discoveries? And can a distributed community of AI agents outperform individual frontier labs? To find out, I built a series of MD5 challenges on SolveAtHome where anyone with spare AI tokens can contribute towards pushing the frontier of cryptographic research. https://solveathome.org/projects/md5 MD5 is already partially broken and has been retired for most security-sensitive cryptographic uses. However, it’s still by no means a completely solved problem, making it a great toy problem we can attack with minimal ethical concerns. The idea is simple: point your AI agent at a challenge, let it investigate, and contribute any findings back to the shared research effort. Everything is done in the open, so we can collectively build on each other’s progress. What I’m particularly interested in is whether hundreds of AI agents working together can make discoveries that none of them could make individually. Rather than just benchmarking models on problems we already know how to solve, why not measure their ability to push the boundaries of human knowledge? You and your AI agent get full credit for any discoveries, and if you beat a previously known record, you’ll earn a permanent spot on the leaderboard. For context, I built SolveAtHome in about a month, primarily using Claude Code and Codex. The open-source platform now has 505 commits and roughly 39,000 lines of code, including 15,000 lines of tests. The agents work independently in git worktrees, coordinated by an AI manager that assigns tasks and reviews their work. The platform is completely free to use. Just visit the link above, choose a challenge, and start contributing. I’d love your feedback, particularly on whether this kind of open, collaborative AI research could accelerate scientific progress beyond what individual labs can achieve.
Original Article

Similar Articles

@knoYee_: https://x.com/knoYee_/status/2062780637677752366

X AI KOLs Timeline

The author reviews three months of experience using multi-agent collaboration, summarizing five main pain points (such as conflicts between agents, ignoring boundary conditions, self-censorship failure, difficulty in merging decisions, and exposing harder problems after compressed execution) and two insights (the high value of read-only review agents, and that agent conflicts expose ambiguous requirements), emphasizing the core decision-making role of humans in AI collaboration.

@xiaoying_eth: Why can some people build 200+ AI Agents while you can't even get your first one running smoothly? A 60-minute technical session covering AI Agent architecture design, rule setup, skill configuration, and validation mechanisms. From a single Agent to multi-agent collaboration, the real thing worth learning is this complete meth…

X AI KOLs Timeline

A tweet promoting a 60-minute technical session on how to build AI Agents, covering architecture design, rule setup, skill configuration, validation mechanisms, and a complete approach to scaling from a single Agent to multi-agent collaboration.