How much of MLE-Bench's gains are the algorithm vs. better models + more search? [R]

Reddit r/MachineLearning Papers

Summary

A new benchmark, FML-Bench, reveals that recent improvements in MLE-Bench scores are largely due to better base models and increased search budget rather than algorithmic advances.

MLE-Bench scores have jumped from 30% to 80% over the last two years. But how much of that is real algorithmic progress vs. better base models + problem definition shifts + overfitting? Turns out: not much. Once you control for the same step budget and models, and then test on a different set of tasks, the two-year-old AIDE algorithm matches modern agent/evolutionary search systems. Figure from FML-Bench, a new automated ML research benchmark, which unifies the code editing agent, step definition, and val/test split, and tries to benchmark the algorithmic efficiency (search/memory) of the agents. paper link: [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.17373](https://t.co/8QllTan4cX) [test improvement and pairwise win-rate](https://preview.redd.it/j9ev4x8kmo4h1.png?width=894&format=png&auto=webp&s=d38392fdc4d14f371db23592d8ef45b34bc1e7a8)
Original Article

Similar Articles

InferenceBench: A Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Inference Optimization by AI Agents

arXiv cs.AI

InferenceBench is a benchmark that evaluates AI agents on optimizing LLM inference speed using an H100 GPU across multiple bottleneck scenarios. Results show agents improve over naive baselines but frequently converge on single frameworks and underperform simple hyperparameter searches, indicating a need for better exploration strategies.