@LuoSays: I disagree. Let me challenge each point: > Most features can be achieved on the web. Yes, they can be, but it often involves unnecessary steps, severely degrading the user experience. For example, in a camera filter app, would users really need to take photos with the native camera, open a website, upload photos, wait for processing, and then download them back, all while paying the same price? Let me give another…
Summary
This is a debate about whether native app development is still necessary, discussing the pros and cons of web apps in terms of user experience, cost, and distribution.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/22/26, 05:29 PM
I disagree. Let me counter each point:
Most functions can be realized on web pages
Yes, they can, but it often involves roundabout methods that significantly compromise user experience.
For example, a camera filter app—would users really take a photo with the native camera, open a website, upload the image, wait for processing, download it, and then pay the same price?
Another example: a fitness or sports app—how would a web page access real-time heart rate, step count, or GPS tracking?
This isn’t just an isolated case; I could list many more.
It can bypass Apple’s commission
Have you considered whether saving that 15% is worth the extra costs you’d incur in user acquisition, trust building, distribution, and the loss of user expectations?
It can try updates
I think you’re referring to “hot updates,” where you don’t need to wait for app store reviews. That’s indeed the biggest advantage of web apps, and I can’t dispute that. However, I believe what truly slows down progress is usually not the review process itself, but rather product decision-making, design, testing, and operations.
Making money through apps and web pages is equally difficult. If web pages can’t earn money, don’t expect apps to.
The value of a product isn’t tied to its format. Some needs naturally lend themselves to web platforms (tools, low-frequency use, search-driven interactions), while others rely on high-frequency engagement and strong presence to succeed. If you try to address the latter only via web, you might fail from the start—not because the need doesn’t exist, but because you’re using the wrong medium.
This is just a rational discussion—no offense intended, Weige.
Weigi (@imwsl90): I think these days, there’s really no need to build apps.
Most functions can be realized on web pages, and you can bypass Apple’s commission while also trying updates.
Some friends might say apps make more money, but I’m quite skeptical of that.
Making money through apps and web pages is equally difficult. If web pages can’t earn money, don’t expect apps to.
Whatever your idea is, start by building a web version to validate it.
Similar Articles
@imwsl90: I really think there's no need to make apps these days. Most functions can be implemented with web pages, and you can also bypass Apple's commission and try updates. Some friends might say apps are more profitable, but I'm skeptical about that. The difficulty of making money with apps and web pages is the same; if you can't make money with web pages, don't expect to make money with apps. What are your thoughts, go and make a web...
The tweet argues that there's no need to develop apps now because web pages can handle most functions and bypass Apple's commission, suggesting to start with web verification.
@CycleDecoded: This tool just launched, and paid typesetting software is sweating. No need to download a client—just open a browser and work. It's an open-source project hand-crafted by Chinese developer nicejade, already with 3.7k stars on GitHub. Simply put, with just a browser, whether you're writing articles, drawing charts, or previewing multimedia, this all-in-one has you covered.
Chinese developer nicejade open-sourced an online typesetting editor. No installation required; write articles, draw charts, and create multimedia content directly in the browser. It has already received 3.7k stars.
@XAMTO_AI: 35 hidden gem websites you should bookmark now—don't say I didn't warn you. Seriously, the internet is full of underrated tools. Most people still use expensive and clunky software simply because they don't know there are better alternatives. Today I've rounded up 35 for you, covering everything from bypassing paywalls to AI photo editing, from automation workflows to free assets—all genuinely useful.
The author compiled 35 practical website recommendations covering categories such as bypassing paywalls, AI photo editing, automation workflows, and free assets, helping users replace expensive or clunky software and boost productivity.
@vista8: Open source, open source! Tired of AI-heavy web design and monotonous layouts? Qiao Bangzhu tested and compared 8 mainstream design Skills, absorbed the strengths of each, and open-sourced his own design Skill: qiaomu-design. Features: 1. Style Fitting Room: Generate four design demos from a single sentence, preview and confirm before development.
Qiao Bangzhu open-sourced the design Skill qiaomu-design, offering features like Style Fitting Room, anti-AI-style design, self-evolution mechanism, and references from mature websites, supporting GLM or Claude models.
@Cander_zhu: This is another article worth reading carefully: "How modern browsers work". After reading it, I had two strong feelings: 1. Browsers are actually the most undervalued "operating system" of modern times. 2. If front-end/Agent developers still treat the browser as a black box, they will only fall behind. From a product and...
A tweet summarizing reflections on the article "How modern browsers work", emphasizing the value of the browser as a modern operating system, and providing 5 key insights for front-end and Agent developers, including multi-process architecture, JS engine compilation pipeline, performance optimization, etc.