What Qwen is thinking when it gets stuck saying "Wait"
Summary
An experiment analyzes why Qwen3.5-0.8B gets stuck repeating 'Wait' by using an interpretability lens on the 'Wait' token, showing doubt-related features dominating near stopping points, and applies a tiny weight edit (0.016% of weights) that converts 'Wrong/Nope/Hmm' into 'Verification/Completion/Result' while sharply improving MATH-500 performance; code and data are released.
Similar Articles
Qwen 3.8 27B Overthinking, It has to be done, it has to be overthinking to punch Opus 4.6
The article discusses Qwen 3.8 27B, a 27B parameter model that uses extensive reasoning tokens to compete with larger models, emphasizing trade-offs in token usage and benefits for local deployment.
Adding logit penalty for "wait", "maybe" and "perhaps" to Qwen models improves their accuracy
An experiment applies logit penalties for specific overthinking tokens to Qwen models using llama.cpp, improving accuracy on the MATH-500 benchmark across various quantizations, with notable accuracy gains and reduced reasoning tokens.
Unpopular opinion : Qwen 3.8 27b is not an overthinker
The article argues that Qwen 3.8 27b's increased reasoning token usage is similar to other Chinese AI models like GLM and DeepSeek, with user frustration stemming from hardware limitations. It suggests using a reasoning budget can maintain performance over Qwen 3.6.
Need a second pair of eyes, this Qwen3.6 27B quant recipe consistently thinks less and is correct
The author shares a quantization recipe for Qwen3.6 27B that makes the model use significantly fewer thinking tokens while still producing correct answers, leading to faster inference on math benchmarks.
Qwen 3.8 27b be like...
The article dramatizes the execution of a test suite for the Qwen 3.8 27b AI model, highlighting a focus on immediate action and results over prolonged analysis.