Getting an LLM agent to actually stay in character, the steering bullseye nobody writes down
Summary
A discussion on techniques for keeping LLM agents consistently in character, highlighting an often overlooked aspect of steering.
Similar Articles
Can LLM Agents Stick to the Script? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Consistency in Interactive Narratives
This paper introduces NCP-Bench, a benchmark derived from 100 movie synopses for evaluating long-horizon narrative consistency in LLM-based interactive storytelling agents. Experiments show that even strong models like GPT-5.2 struggle to maintain logical consistency, with a 42% survival rate after 20 turns and high fact conflict rates.
Your LLM Doesn’t Need Better Prompts — It Needs an Agent Harness
An article discusses the need for Agent Harness Engineering—structured systems with tool validation, context management, guardrails, telemetry, and verification loops—to make LLM agents reliable in production, arguing that better prompts alone are insufficient.
Doing What They Say, Not What They Reason: Locating the Faithfulness Gap in LLM Agents
This paper decomposes the faithfulness gap in LLM agents into reasoning→conclusion and conclusion→action steps using Texas Hold'em poker as a controlled environment. It finds that the conclusion→action step is reliable, while the reasoning→conclusion step is the primary source of inconsistency.
Mechanistic Personality Analysis of LLMs Steering Personality via Latent Feature Interventions
This paper introduces a mechanistic interpretability approach to steer LLM personality traits by identifying and intervening on latent features using sparse autoencoders, achieving controllable personality modulation while maintaining language performance.
Your LLM prompt has 200 lines. Do you actually know if the agent follows any of them?
This article discusses the challenges of evaluating and monitoring LLM-based agents in production, covering offline evals, prompt engineering pitfalls, observability tools, review queues, labeling, clustering, topic classification, and cost-effective layering of human review, LLM-as-a-judge, and small classifiers.