@AnjneyMidha: Compute isn’t venture. It’s infra with venture demand curves and utility contract structures The right comp is 90s era …
Summary
An argument that compute should be viewed as infrastructure with venture-like demand curves and utility contract structures, drawing a parallel to 1990s independent power producers.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/19/26, 06:47 AM
Compute isn’t venture. It’s infra with venture demand curves and utility contract structures
The right comp is 90s era independent power producers, except the offtakers have stronger balance sheets and steeper demand than anything in energy history
Most investors will miss it
Similar Articles
Let's talk about trading compute (16 minute read)
The article explores the emerging market for compute derivatives and their potential to transform how neoclouds manage GPU rental risks and pricing in the AI inference cloud industry.
Why Compute Is the New Scarce Digital Asset
AI demand is growing faster than physical infrastructure, creating compute bottlenecks and making scarce compute capacity highly valuable.
Can Compute Commoditize if it's Not Fungible? (5 minute read)
Analyzes the argument that AI compute cannot become a commodity due to non-fungibility, using commodity market analogies to suggest that a standardized reference plus basis trading could enable commoditization.
AI infrastructure is starting to look less like “apps” and more like energy + compute
Leopold Aschenbrenner backs crypto miners pivoting to AI infrastructure, leveraging their existing expertise in power, cooling, and large-scale facilities for AI data centers.
So, SpaceX is the new Compute landlord and compute is the new leverage point and every deal is ultimately about who controls GPU controls at scale
The article analyzes how SpaceX is emerging as a major compute provider for AI companies, with deals supplying GPUs to Anthropic and Cursor, and Google exploring orbital data centers through SpaceX.